From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: David CARLIER <devnexen@gmail.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jagielski, Jedrzej" <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Jedrzej Jagielski" <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: E610: do not fill EEE lp_advertised from local PHY caps
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 15:12:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92b40e66-3f68-4d4a-b0cf-47b8aea5c72b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+XhMqxjWOXVJXGUx5BE+U0S0SOOoSwaKu8eWigS=J5EfFejcQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/4/2026 7:05 AM, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> No E610 here, found it by reading the code - the X550 path
> (ixgbe_get_eee_fw) uses a separate FW_PHY_ACT_UD_2 activity and
> ixgbe_lp_map[] for partner data, the E610 path just feeds
> pcaps.eee_cap from REPORT_ACTIVE_CFG into lp_advertised. None of
> the IXGBE_ACI_REPORT_* modes return partner info so that field
> can't be right.
>
> The set path goes hw->mac.ops.setup_eee() ->
> ixgbe_aci_set_phy_cfg(),
> so negotiation is in the firmware. eee_active / eee_enabled come
> from link.eee_status from the same FW, if those bits are right then
> negotiation works. Can't say more without hardware, Jedrzej or
> Aleksandr would know.
>
> Cheers
Hi David,
Thanks for the report and possible patch. The EEE support just merged,
and I believe the series has undergone testing. It is possible E610 is
significantly different from X550.
@Jedrzej,
Could you please look at this patch and the report from David and
confirm if we need this (or a different?) fix or if the code is correct
for E610 and explain why in that case?
Thanks,
Jake
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-04 6:22 [PATCH] ixgbe: E610: do not fill EEE lp_advertised from local PHY caps David Carlier
2026-05-04 12:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-05-04 14:05 ` David CARLIER
2026-05-04 22:12 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92b40e66-3f68-4d4a-b0cf-47b8aea5c72b@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox