public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: David CARLIER <devnexen@gmail.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Jagielski, Jedrzej" <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Jedrzej Jagielski" <jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com>,
	Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: E610: do not fill EEE lp_advertised from local PHY caps
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 15:12:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92b40e66-3f68-4d4a-b0cf-47b8aea5c72b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+XhMqxjWOXVJXGUx5BE+U0S0SOOoSwaKu8eWigS=J5EfFejcQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/4/2026 7:05 AM, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
>   No E610 here, found it by reading the code - the X550 path
>   (ixgbe_get_eee_fw) uses a separate FW_PHY_ACT_UD_2 activity and
>   ixgbe_lp_map[] for partner data, the E610 path just feeds
>   pcaps.eee_cap from REPORT_ACTIVE_CFG into lp_advertised. None of
>   the IXGBE_ACI_REPORT_* modes return partner info so that field
>   can't be right.
> 
>   The set path goes hw->mac.ops.setup_eee() ->
> ixgbe_aci_set_phy_cfg(),
>   so negotiation is in the firmware. eee_active / eee_enabled come
>   from link.eee_status from the same FW, if those bits are right then
>   negotiation works. Can't say more without hardware, Jedrzej or
>   Aleksandr would know.
> 
> Cheers

Hi David,

Thanks for the report and possible patch. The EEE support just merged,
and I believe the series has undergone testing. It is possible E610 is
significantly different from X550.

@Jedrzej,

Could you please look at this patch and the report from David and
confirm if we need this (or a different?) fix or if the code is correct
for E610 and explain why in that case?

Thanks,
Jake

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-04  6:22 [PATCH] ixgbe: E610: do not fill EEE lp_advertised from local PHY caps David Carlier
2026-05-04 12:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-05-04 14:05   ` David CARLIER
2026-05-04 22:12     ` Jacob Keller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92b40e66-3f68-4d4a-b0cf-47b8aea5c72b@intel.com \
    --to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jedrzej.jagielski@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox