From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
"Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"dust . li" <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] virtio-net: xsk zero copy xmit setup
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:51:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93394cbc-ed6a-d07f-7f52-e584b48ca2cd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8uoz2LzrvZUsDfFuKiFkyRwdWtEk8AF9y7Nb6RKzB7pO3YDw@mail.gmail.com>
在 2021/4/14 下午3:36, Magnus Karlsson 写道:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 9:58 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>> xsk is a high-performance packet receiving and sending technology.
>>
>> This patch implements the binding and unbinding operations of xsk and
>> the virtio-net queue for xsk zero copy xmit.
>>
>> The xsk zero copy xmit depends on tx napi. So if tx napi is not true,
>> an error will be reported. And the entire operation is under the
>> protection of rtnl_lock.
>>
>> If xsk is active, it will prevent ethtool from modifying tx napi.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index f52a25091322..8242a9e9f17d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>> #include <net/route.h>
>> #include <net/xdp.h>
>> #include <net/net_failover.h>
>> +#include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
>>
>> static int napi_weight = NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT;
>> module_param(napi_weight, int, 0444);
>> @@ -133,6 +134,11 @@ struct send_queue {
>> struct virtnet_sq_stats stats;
>>
>> struct napi_struct napi;
>> +
>> + struct {
>> + /* xsk pool */
>> + struct xsk_buff_pool __rcu *pool;
>> + } xsk;
>> };
>>
>> /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */
>> @@ -2249,8 +2255,19 @@ static int virtnet_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
>> if (napi_weight ^ vi->sq[0].napi.weight) {
>> if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
>> return -EBUSY;
>> - for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++)
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + /* xsk xmit depend on the tx napi. So if xsk is active,
>> + * prevent modifications to tx napi.
>> + */
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + if (rcu_dereference(vi->sq[i].xsk.pool)) {
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> vi->sq[i].napi.weight = napi_weight;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -2518,11 +2535,70 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static int virtnet_xsk_pool_enable(struct net_device *dev,
>> + struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>> + u16 qid)
>> +{
>> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct send_queue *sq;
>> +
>> + if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> + return -EINVAL;
> Your implementation is the first implementation that only supports
> zerocopy for one out of Rx and Tx, and this will currently confuse the
> control plane in some situations since it assumes that both Rx and Tx
> are enabled by a call to this NDO. For example: user space creates an
> xsk socket with both an Rx and a Tx ring, then calls bind with the
> XDP_ZEROCOPY flag. In this case, the call should fail if the device is
> virtio-net since it only supports zerocopy for Tx. But it should
> succeed if the user only created a Tx ring since that makes it a
> Tx-only socket which can be supported.
>
> So you need to introduce a new interface in xdp_sock_drv.h that can be
> used to ask if this socket has Rx enabled and if so fail the call (at
> least one of them has to be enabled, otherwise the bind call would
> fail before this ndo is called). Then the logic above will act on that
> and try to fall back to copy mode (if allowed). Such an interface
> (with an added "is_tx_enabled") might in the future be useful for
> physical NIC drivers too if they would like to save on resources for
> Tx-only and Rx-only sockets. Currently, they all just assume every
> socket is Rx and Tx.
So if there's no blocker for implementing the zerocopy RX, I think we'd
better to implement it in this series without introducing new APIs for
the upper layer.
Thanks
>
> Thanks: Magnus
>
>> +
>> + sq = &vi->sq[qid];
>> +
>> + /* xsk zerocopy depend on the tx napi.
>> + *
>> + * xsk zerocopy xmit is driven by the tx interrupt. When the device is
>> + * not busy, napi will be called continuously to send data. When the
>> + * device is busy, wait for the notification interrupt after the
>> + * hardware has finished processing the data, and continue to send data
>> + * in napi.
>> + */
>> + if (!sq->napi.weight)
>> + return -EPERM;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + /* Here is already protected by rtnl_lock, so rcu_assign_pointer is
>> + * safe.
>> + */
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(sq->xsk.pool, pool);
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int virtnet_xsk_pool_disable(struct net_device *dev, u16 qid)
>> +{
>> + struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>> + struct send_queue *sq;
>> +
>> + if (qid >= vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + sq = &vi->sq[qid];
>> +
>> + /* Here is already protected by rtnl_lock, so rcu_assign_pointer is
>> + * safe.
>> + */
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(sq->xsk.pool, NULL);
>> +
>> + synchronize_net(); /* Sync with the XSK wakeup and with NAPI. */
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int virtnet_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
>> {
>> switch (xdp->command) {
>> case XDP_SETUP_PROG:
>> return virtnet_xdp_set(dev, xdp->prog, xdp->extack);
>> + case XDP_SETUP_XSK_POOL:
>> + if (xdp->xsk.pool)
>> + return virtnet_xsk_pool_enable(dev, xdp->xsk.pool,
>> + xdp->xsk.queue_id);
>> + else
>> + return virtnet_xsk_pool_disable(dev, xdp->xsk.queue_id);
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.31.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 3:15 [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] virtio-net support xdp socket zero copy xmit Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/10] netdevice: priv_flags extend to 64bit Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-13 5:19 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-13 6:30 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-13 18:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/10] netdevice: add priv_flags IFF_NOT_USE_DMA_ADDR Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/10] virtio-net: " Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/10] xsk: support get page by addr Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-14 6:59 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] xsk: XDP_SETUP_XSK_POOL support option IFF_NOT_USE_DMA_ADDR Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-14 7:00 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] virtio-net: unify the code for recycling the xmit ptr Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-14 3:32 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/10] virtio-net: virtnet_poll_tx support budget check Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-14 3:34 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] virtio-net: xsk zero copy xmit setup Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-14 4:01 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-14 7:36 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-14 7:51 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/10] virtio-net: xsk zero copy xmit implement wakeup and xmit Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-14 5:46 ` Jason Wang
2021-04-13 3:15 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/10] virtio-net: xsk zero copy xmit kick by threshold Xuan Zhuo
2021-04-14 5:51 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93394cbc-ed6a-d07f-7f52-e584b48ca2cd@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).