From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yunsheng Lin Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 06/12] net: mroute: Check if rule is a default rule Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:28:21 +0800 Message-ID: <93dcea9d-94eb-39cf-4102-e5c59fb2dfa5@huawei.com> References: <20170924172212.10096-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20170924172212.10096-7-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , To: Jiri Pirko , Return-path: Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:6560 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753473AbdIYB2c (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:28:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170924172212.10096-7-jiri@resnulli.us> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Jiri On 2017/9/25 1:22, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Yotam Gigi > > When the ipmr starts, it adds one default FIB rule that matches all packets > and sends them to the DEFAULT (multicast) FIB table. A more complex rule > can be added by user to specify that for a specific interface, a packet > should be look up at either an arbitrary table or according to the l3mdev > of the interface. > > For drivers willing to offload the ipmr logic into a hardware but don't > want to offload all the FIB rules functionality, provide a function that > can indicate whether the FIB rule is the default multicast rule, thus only > one routing table is needed. > > This way, a driver can register to the FIB notification chain, get > notifications about FIB rules added and trigger some kind of an internal > abort mechanism when a non default rule is added by the user. > > Signed-off-by: Yotam Gigi > Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel > Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko > --- > include/linux/mroute.h | 7 +++++++ > net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mroute.h b/include/linux/mroute.h > index 5566580..b072a84 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mroute.h > +++ b/include/linux/mroute.h > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@ int ip_mroute_getsockopt(struct sock *, int, char __user *, int __user *); > int ipmr_ioctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, void __user *arg); > int ipmr_compat_ioctl(struct sock *sk, unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg); > int ip_mr_init(void); > +bool ipmr_rule_default(const struct fib_rule *rule); > #else > static inline int ip_mroute_setsockopt(struct sock *sock, int optname, > char __user *optval, unsigned int optlen) > @@ -46,6 +48,11 @@ static inline int ip_mroute_opt(int opt) > { > return 0; > } > + > +static inline bool ipmr_rule_default(const struct fib_rule *rule) > +{ > + return true; > +} > #endif > > struct vif_device { > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c > index 2a795d2..a714f55 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c > @@ -320,6 +320,16 @@ static unsigned int ipmr_rules_seq_read(struct net *net) > } > #endif > > +bool ipmr_rule_default(const struct fib_rule *rule) > +{ > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FIB_RULES) > + return fib_rule_matchall(rule) && rule->table == RT_TABLE_DEFAULT; > +#else > + return true; > +#endif In patch 02, You have the following, can you do the same for the above? +#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MROUTE +void ipmr_cache_free(struct mfc_cache *mfc_cache); +#else +static inline void ipmr_cache_free(struct mfc_cache *mfc_cache) +{ +} +#endif > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmr_rule_default); > + > static inline int ipmr_hash_cmp(struct rhashtable_compare_arg *arg, > const void *ptr) > { >