From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: do not update snd_una if it is same with ack_seq Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2018 10:04:03 -0700 Message-ID: <945a90d62aa45c4b53349ba0a104574759d40efe.camel@perches.com> References: <1541264071-9905-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Yafang Shao , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0172.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.172]:53648 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726849AbeKDCP5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Nov 2018 22:15:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1541264071-9905-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 2018-11-04 at 00:54 +0800, Yafang Shao wrote: > In the slow path, TCP_SKB_SB(skb)->ack_seq may be same with tp->snd_una, > and under this condition we don't need to update the snd_una. > > Furthermore, tcp_ack_update_window() is only called in slow path, > so introducing this check won't affect the fast path processing. [] > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c [] > @@ -3610,7 +3611,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag) > if (flag & FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT) > tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq); > > - if (!(flag & FLAG_SLOWPATH) && after(ack, prior_snd_una)) { > + if (!(flag & FLAG_SLOWPATH) && flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED) { stylistic nit: While the precedence is correct in any case, perhaps adding parentheses around flag & FLAG_SND_UNA_ADVANCED would make it more obvious.