From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] net, skbuff: do not prefer skb allocation fails early
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 02:29:28 -0800
Message-ID: <948700b2-993b-e17f-67df-e8517e87998d@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901021300420.62853@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901021300420.62853@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org



On 01/02/2019 01:01 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> Commit dcda9b04713c ("mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by 
> __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic") replaced __GFP_REPEAT in
> alloc_skb_with_frags() with __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL when the allocation may
> directly reclaim.
> 
> The previous behavior would require reclaim up to 1 << order pages for
> skb aligned header_len of order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER before failing,
> otherwise the allocations in alloc_skb() would loop in the page allocator
> looking for memory.  __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL makes both allocations failable
> under memory pressure, including for the HEAD allocation.
> 
> This can cause, among many other things, write() to fail with ENOTCONN
> during RPC when under memory pressure.  
> 
> These allocations should succeed as they did previous to dcda9b04713c
> even if it requires calling the oom killer and additional looping in the
> page allocator to find memory.  There is no way to specify the previous
> behavior of __GFP_REPEAT, but it's unlikely to be necessary since the
> previous behavior only guaranteed that 1 << order pages would be reclaimed
> before failing for order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER.  That reclaim is not
> guaranteed to be contiguous memory, so repeating for such large orders is
> usually not beneficial.
> 
> Removing the setting of __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL to restore the previous
> behavior, specifically not allowing alloc_skb() to fail for small orders
> and oom kill if necessary rather than allowing RPCs to fail.
> 
> Fixes: dcda9b04713c ("mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by
> __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic") 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Thanks David.