From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: "Álvaro Fernández Rojas" <noltari@gmail.com>,
jonas.gorski@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, olteanv@gmail.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers: net: dsa: b53: mmap: add phy ops
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:06:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <95e106fd-d1ce-b9d4-a4f7-03fb69bd4aaa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320182813.963508-1-noltari@gmail.com>
On 3/20/23 11:28, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Currently, B53 MMAP BCM63xx devices with an external switch hang when
> performing PHY read and write operations due to invalid registers access.
> This adds support for PHY ops by using the internal bus from mdio-mux-bcm6368
> when probed by device tree and also falls back to direct MDIO registers if not.
>
> This is an alternative to:
> - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20230317113427.302162-1-noltari@gmail.com/
> - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230317113427.302162-2-noltari@gmail.com/
> - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230317113427.302162-3-noltari@gmail.com/
> - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230317113427.302162-4-noltari@gmail.com/
> As discussed, it was an ABI break and not the correct way of fixing the issue.
Looks good for the most part, just a few questions below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/platform_data/b53.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c
> index 706df04b6cee..7deca1c557c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_mmap.c
> @@ -19,14 +19,25 @@
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_mdio.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/b53.h>
>
> #include "b53_priv.h"
>
> +#define REG_MDIOC 0xb0
> +#define REG_MDIOC_EXT_MASK BIT(16)
> +#define REG_MDIOC_REG_SHIFT 20
> +#define REG_MDIOC_PHYID_SHIFT 25
> +#define REG_MDIOC_RD_MASK BIT(30)
> +#define REG_MDIOC_WR_MASK BIT(31)
For some reason, there was no bit introduced to tell us when a
transaction has finished, so we have to poll after a certain delay has
elapsed...
> +
> +#define REG_MDIOD 0xb4
> +
> struct b53_mmap_priv {
> void __iomem *regs;
> + struct mii_bus *bus;
> };
>
> static int b53_mmap_read8(struct b53_device *dev, u8 page, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> @@ -216,6 +227,69 @@ static int b53_mmap_write64(struct b53_device *dev, u8 page, u8 reg,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline void b53_mmap_mdio_read(struct b53_device *dev, int phy_id,
> + int loc, u16 *val)
> +{
> + uint32_t reg;
> +
> + b53_mmap_write32(dev, 0, REG_MDIOC, 0);
> +
> + reg = REG_MDIOC_RD_MASK |
> + (phy_id << REG_MDIOC_PHYID_SHIFT) |
> + (loc << REG_MDIOC_REG_SHIFT);
> +
> + b53_mmap_write32(dev, 0, REG_MDIOC, reg);
> + udelay(50);
> + b53_mmap_read16(dev, 0, REG_MDIOD, val);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int b53_mmap_mdio_write(struct b53_device *dev, int phy_id,
> + int loc, u16 val)
> +{
> + uint32_t reg;
> +
> + b53_mmap_write32(dev, 0, REG_MDIOC, 0);
> +
> + reg = REG_MDIOC_WR_MASK |
> + (phy_id << REG_MDIOC_PHYID_SHIFT) |
> + (loc << REG_MDIOC_REG_SHIFT) |
> + val;
> +
> + b53_mmap_write32(dev, 0, REG_MDIOC, reg);
> + udelay(50);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int b53_mmap_phy_read16(struct b53_device *dev, int addr, int reg,
> + u16 *value)
> +{
> + struct b53_mmap_priv *priv = dev->priv;
> + struct mii_bus *bus = priv->bus;
> +
> + if (bus)
> + *value = mdiobus_read_nested(bus, addr, reg);
Since you make the 'mii-bus' property and 'priv->bus' necessary
prerequisites for the driver to finish probing successfully, when shall
we not have valid priv->bus reference to work with? Do we end-up taking
the other path at all?
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-20 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 18:28 [RFC PATCH] drivers: net: dsa: b53: mmap: add phy ops Álvaro Fernández Rojas
2023-03-20 19:06 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2023-03-20 19:58 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas
2023-03-21 9:32 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas
2023-03-21 10:35 ` Jonas Gorski
2023-03-21 18:04 ` Álvaro Fernández Rojas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=95e106fd-d1ce-b9d4-a4f7-03fb69bd4aaa@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jonas.gorski@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noltari@gmail.com \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).