public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
	mptcp@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>,
	Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 13:15:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9791b7d2-734b-4148-ad7b-89a374420a9c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403130734.93981-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

Hi Jiayuan,

On 03/04/2026 15:07, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> The ehash table lookups are lockless and rely on
> SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to guarantee socket memory stability
> during RCU read-side critical sections. Both tcp_prot and
> tcpv6_prot have their slab caches created with this flag
> via proto_register().
> 
> However, MPTCP's mptcp_subflow_init() copies tcpv6_prot into
> tcpv6_prot_override during inet_init() (fs_initcall, level 5),
> before inet6_init() (module_init/device_initcall, level 6) has
> called proto_register(&tcpv6_prot). At that point,
> tcpv6_prot.slab is still NULL, so tcpv6_prot_override.slab
> remains NULL permanently.
> 
> This causes MPTCP v6 subflow child sockets to be allocated via
> kmalloc (falling into kmalloc-4k) instead of the TCPv6 slab
> cache. The kmalloc-4k cache lacks SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, so
> when these sockets are freed without SOCK_RCU_FREE (which is
> cleared for child sockets by design), the memory can be
> immediately reused. Concurrent ehash lookups under
> rcu_read_lock can then access freed memory, triggering a
> slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established.

Good catch! Thank you for this patch.

> Fix this by splitting the IPv6-specific initialization out of
> mptcp_subflow_init() into a new mptcp_subflow_v6_init(), which
> is called from mptcpv6_init() after proto_register(&tcpv6_prot)
> has completed. This ensures tcpv6_prot_override.slab correctly
> inherits the SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache.

The split makes sense anyway: better to regroup all v6-related init steps.

> Fixes: b19bc2945b40 ("mptcp: implement delegated actions")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
> ---
>  net/mptcp/ctrl.c     |  6 +++++-
>  net/mptcp/protocol.h |  1 +
>  net/mptcp/subflow.c  | 15 +++++++++------
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/ctrl.c b/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
> index d96130e49942..5887ddcdb875 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
> @@ -583,7 +583,11 @@ int __init mptcpv6_init(void)
>  	int err;
>  
>  	err = mptcp_proto_v6_init();
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>  
> -	return err;
> +	mptcp_subflow_v6_init();

I think it would be better to move this to mptcp_proto_v6_init, similar
to what is done with mptcp_subflow_init, from mptcp_proto_init.

From there, you can even call it before registering the protocol, at the
beginning, so before inet6_register_protosw, which seems more logical
and similar to what is done in v4. WDYT?

If you send a v2, can you please remove the 'net:' prefix please?
'mptcp:' is enough:

  [PATCH net v2] mptcp: fix (...)

Also, can you add a "Cc: stable" tag please?

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-04 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03 13:07 [PATCH net v1] net: mptcp: fix slab-use-after-free in __inet_lookup_established Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-04  1:55 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-04 11:15 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-04-04 14:16   ` Jiayuan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9791b7d2-734b-4148-ad7b-89a374420a9c@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martineau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox