From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: iproute2 net-next Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:07:24 -0700 Message-ID: <985e9f80-3457-abab-d269-c1692e1bee8c@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <20171225104919.2568e975@xeon-e3> <20171226044743.GK2942@mtr-leonro.local> <20171225221426.57d4af0b@xeon-e3> <20171226093547.GC10734@mtr-leonro.local> <5f75c535-e4a0-1cfa-d4b0-c3c60d50a1c6@iogearbox.net> <20171229085823.GA2000@nanopsycho> <20171229200028.78c1371a@xeon-e3> <20180116015614.GA7579@localhost.localdomain> <212fd0ef-f2d4-6141-cc6a-d2c36dea95ca@cumulusnetworks.com> <20180115192921.1a4c8a24@cakuba.netronome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Stephen Hemminger , Jiri Pirko , Daniel Borkmann , Leon Romanovsky , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Kicinski Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:44646 "EHLO mail-pg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751007AbeAVQH1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:07:27 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m20so7418573pgc.11 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:07:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20180115192921.1a4c8a24@cakuba.netronome.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 1/15/18 8:29 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > About the branches - what should we base our patches on for net-next? > Most -next repos just use the master, but it seems that in case of > iproute2-next.git the net-next branch is still active, and there is > an inactive net-next branch in iproute2.git.. Is this transitional or > will it stay this way? The master branch for iproute2-next tree has been updated to be the branch for -next patches and the net-next branch has been deleted.