Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression between 4.13 and 4.14
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 11:48:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <988a00db-bab3-7318-5e31-2a7c0948262a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17a364e0-89c8-d4f6-3873-353c7dae4fba@candelatech.com>



On 05/09/2018 11:43 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/08/2018 10:10 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/08/2018 09:44 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to track down a performance regression that appears to be between 4.13
>>> and 4.14.
>>>
>>> I first saw the problem with a hacked version of pktgen on some ixgbe NICs.  4.13 can do
>>> right at 10G bi-directional on two ports, and 4.14 and later can do only about 6Gbps.
>>>
>>> I also tried with user-space UDP traffic on a stock kernel, and I can get about 3.2Gbps combined tx+rx
>>> on 4.14 and about 4.4Gbps on 4.13.
>>>
>>> Attempting to bisect seems to be triggering a weirdness in git, and also lots of commits
>>> crash or do not bring up networking, which makes the bisect difficult.
>>>
>>> Looking at perf top, it would appear that some lock is probably to blame.
>>
>>
>> perf record -a -g -e cycles:pp sleep 5
>> perf report
>>
>> Then you'll be able to tell us which lock (or call graph) is killing your perf.
>>
> 
> I seem to be chasing multiple issues.  For 4.13, at least part of my problem was that LOCKDEP was enabled,
> during my bisect, though it does NOT appear enabled in 4.16.  I think maybe CONFIG_LOCKDEP moved to CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> in 4.16, or something like that?  My 4.16 .config does have CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT enabled, and I see no option to disable it:
> 
> [greearb@ben-dt3 linux-4.16.x64]$ grep LOCKDEP .config
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y
> 
> 
> For 4.16, I am disabling RETRAMPOLINE...are there any other such things I need
> to disable to keep from getting a performance hit from the spectre-related bug
> fixes?  At this point, I do not care about the security implications.
> 
> greearb@ben-dt3 linux-4.16.x64]$ grep RETPO .config
> # CONFIG_RETPOLINE is not set
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 

No idea really, you mention a 4.13 -> 4.14 regression and jump then to 4.16 :/

Before doing a (painful) dissection, the perf output would immediately tell you if
something is really wrong on your .config.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-09 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-08 16:44 Performance regression between 4.13 and 4.14 Ben Greear
2018-05-08 17:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-05-09 18:43   ` Ben Greear
2018-05-09 18:48     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2018-05-09 19:02       ` Ben Greear
2018-05-09 20:55         ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=988a00db-bab3-7318-5e31-2a7c0948262a@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox