From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:51:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9897026.Es27HaT4ta@natalenko.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iL3Bd-+Bq2srDMAzh6OOQM_dxCC6_b_pUesXtnVAGigbA@mail.gmail.com>
On úterý 20. února 2018 20:39:49 CET Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I am not trying to compare BBR and Reno on a lossless link.
>
> Reno is running as fast as possible and will win when bufferbloat is
> not an issue.
>
> If bufferbloat is not an issue, simply use Reno and be happy ;)
>
> My patch helps BBR only, I thought it was obvious ;)
Umm, yes, and my point was rather something like "the speed on a lossless link
while using BBR with and without this patch is the same". Sorry for a
confusion. I guess, the key word here is "lossless".
Oleksandr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 19:56 [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code Eric Dumazet
2018-02-19 19:56 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] tcp: switch to GSO being always on Eric Dumazet
2018-02-20 1:22 ` kbuild test robot
2018-02-19 19:56 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] tcp: remove sk_can_gso() use Eric Dumazet
2018-02-19 19:56 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] tcp: remove sk_check_csum_caps() Eric Dumazet
2018-02-19 19:56 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] tcp: tcp_sendmsg() only deals with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL Eric Dumazet
2018-02-19 19:56 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] tcp: remove dead code from tcp_set_skb_tso_segs() Eric Dumazet
2018-02-19 19:56 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] tcp: remove dead code after CHECKSUM_PARTIAL adoption Eric Dumazet
2018-02-20 1:45 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2018-02-20 9:32 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-02-20 15:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-20 18:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-20 19:35 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-02-20 19:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-20 19:51 ` Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2018-02-20 19:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-20 20:06 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-02-20 20:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-20 20:45 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-02-20 23:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-21 6:14 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2018-02-21 14:43 ` [PATCH net] tcp_bbr: better deal with suboptimal GSO Eric Dumazet
2018-02-21 15:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-02-21 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-02-21 15:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2018-02-21 15:14 ` Neal Cardwell
2018-02-21 15:18 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2018-02-22 19:16 ` David Miller
2018-02-21 19:37 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code David Miller
2018-02-28 20:10 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9897026.Es27HaT4ta@natalenko.name \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).