From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vulcan.natalenko.name ([104.207.131.136]:38756 "EHLO
        vulcan.natalenko.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750735AbeBTTvW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:51:22 -0500
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:51:20 +0100
Message-ID: <9897026.Es27HaT4ta@natalenko.name>
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iL3Bd-+Bq2srDMAzh6OOQM_dxCC6_b_pUesXtnVAGigbA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180219195652.242663-1-edumazet@google.com> <4964697.hB4CnsZvNY@natalenko.name> <CANn89iL3Bd-+Bq2srDMAzh6OOQM_dxCC6_b_pUesXtnVAGigbA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On =FAter=FD 20. =FAnora 2018 20:39:49 CET Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I am not trying to compare BBR and Reno on a lossless link.
>=20
> Reno is running as fast as possible and will win when bufferbloat is
> not an issue.
>=20
> If bufferbloat is not an issue, simply use Reno and be happy ;)
>=20
> My patch helps BBR only, I thought it was obvious ;)

Umm, yes, and my point was rather something like "the speed on a lossless l=
ink=20
while using BBR with and without this patch is the same". Sorry for a=20
confusion. I guess, the key word here is "lossless".

Oleksandr