From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
To: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Yael Chemla <ychemla@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] netdev: expose io_uring rx_page_order order via netlink
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:53:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <991fd6d5-41f6-4cc7-b6f8-d56e4be6c638@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b581d253-135b-4c75-a50d-2049c6d6e249@nvidia.com>
On 6/13/26 15:09, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> On 13.06.26 11:53, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 6/12/26 22:17, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
>>> This adds observability for the io_uring zcrx rx-buf-len configuration.
>>
>> It might be nicer to look it up in the queue, e.g. rxq->mp_params,
>> and make it a queue attribute instead of zcrx specific one. In either
>> case, no objections.
>>
> In io_pp_nl_fill() or in page_pool_nl_fill() as it was done in v1 for order?
I didn't see v1, so yeah, I was thinking along the same lines as
your previous version. Oh, well
--
Pavel Begunkov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 21:17 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] netdev: expose page pool order via netlink Dragos Tatulea
2026-06-12 21:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] netdev: expose io_uring rx_page_order " Dragos Tatulea
2026-06-13 9:53 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-06-13 14:09 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-06-14 0:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-15 11:16 ` Pavel Begunkov
2026-06-15 20:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-15 10:53 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2026-06-12 21:17 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] io_uring/zcrx: selftests: verify rx_buf_len for large chunks Dragos Tatulea
2026-06-15 20:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] netdev: expose page pool order via netlink patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=991fd6d5-41f6-4cc7-b6f8-d56e4be6c638@gmail.com \
--to=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=ychemla@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox