From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jeff Kirsher" Subject: Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware() Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:20:24 -0800 Message-ID: <9929d2390901041820h4cf51e2h3612108c516b6869@mail.gmail.com> References: <1230626401.24796.22.camel@jaswinder.satnam> <9929d2390812301433pae01ea4g5bfdef6d4d4c7a9c@mail.gmail.com> <20090104.160611.252248503.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux.nics@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, jaswinder@infradead.org To: "David Miller" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090104.160611.252248503.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: e1000-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Jeff Kirsher" > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:33:36 -0800 > >> Please hold off on committing, until we have had ample time to do some >> regression testing. While this patch may have been in linux-next, >> this is the first we have seen of it. >> >> I am concerned that IPMI traffic will be adversely affected by this patch. > > Status please? > -- > The only testing left to do is to make sure that ICH devices still work and to make sure the IPMI traffic is not affected by this patch. All other testing looks good. I am sorry that I have been slow to give status, the holiday's have put a strain on available resources. -- Cheers, Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------