From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: Debounce code vs. dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu() and e100 driver. Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:27:01 -0700 Message-ID: <9929d2390907161527v6ae2751fy31957b643ee0cd88@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090714.123848.189674670.davem@davemloft.net> <20090714.140507.211725964.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: khc@pm.waw.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:15638 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932998AbZGPW1C (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:27:02 -0400 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so191722qwh.37 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:27:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090714.140507.211725964.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:05 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Krzysztof Halasa > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:01:54 +0200 > >> Maybe you apply the workaround for 2.6.31 and I (or someone) will >> convert e100 to coherent allocs for packet descriptors, post-31? > > I think that's a good plan. > > Will give a few days for Intel folks to chime in before applying > your patch for 2.6.31, but otherwise that's my plan. Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher -- Cheers, Jeff