Re: Diagnostic Monitoring Interface Monitoring (DOM) PATCH 0/5 for net-next-2.6

[Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>]

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 00:18, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 14:45, Robert Olsson <robert@herjulf.net> wrote:
>>
>> Here are basic support to bring Diagnostic Monitoring Interface Monitoring (DOM)
>> to Linux this is more or less mandatory when building optical networks.
>>
>> Optical modules as SFP, SFP+, XFP, GBIC etc holds transceiver and link diagnostic
>> data needed to monitor and troubleshoot optical links, Talks to networks cards
>> via the I2C-bus (DOM lives in memory page 0xA2).
>>
>> In essential:
>>
>> Usage example: ethtool -D eth5
>>
>> Ext-Calbr: Avr RX-Power: Alarm & Warn: RX_LOS:         Wavelength: 1310 nm
>> Alarms, warnings in beginning of line, Ie. AH = Alarm High, WL == Warn Low etc
>>       Temp:  35.9 C                   Thresh: Lo: -12.0/-8.0   Hi: 103.0/110.0 C
>>       Vcc:  3.33 V                    Thresh: Lo:   3.0/3.0    Hi:   3.7/4.0   V
>>       Tx-Bias:  13.4 mA               Thresh: Lo:   2.0/4.0    Hi:  70.0/84.0  mA
>> ALWL   TX-pwr:  -5.9 dBm ( 0.26 mW)    Thresh: Lo:  -4.0/-2.0   Hi:   7.0/8.2   dBm
>> AHWH   RX-pwr:  -5.0 dBm ( 0.31 mW)    Thresh: Lo: -35.2/-28.0  Hi:  -8.2/-6.0  dBm
>>
>> Read more in Documentation/networking/dom.txt
>>
>> It's tested with the igb driver, there is also a patch for the ixgbe driver but I
>> haven't any SFP+ with DOM support yet.
>>
>>
>> There are room for improvements an clean-ups.
>>
>> Cheers
>>                                                --ro
>>
>
> Robert, to help get more eyes on this I have added it to my tree for
> internal testing and review.
>

FYI- This patch series is riddled with trailing whitespace, when I
imported that patches into my tree, I cleaned up all the whitespace
errors.  After some internal testing and review, I can re-post the
entire series which has been cleaned up.

-- 
Cheers,
Jeff