From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: [net-2.6 PATCH 1/5] e1000e: call pci_save_state() after pci_restore_state() Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:59:32 -0800 Message-ID: <9929d2391001072359u499b3269v9b0c1cd6ca864798@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100108023033.31476.4034.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100107.235240.173918660.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:41446 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750848Ab0AHH7d (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2010 02:59:33 -0500 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so12524423pwj.21 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:59:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100107.235240.173918660.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 23:52, David Miller wrote: > > Aren't the fragment overrun patches for e1000 and e1000e 1,000 times > more important that thumb twiddling fixes like these? :-( > -- I would agree, and Jesse's updated patches which were made 1 day ago are currently under test and review, where as these patches were produced over Christmas break and testing was completed before Jesse completed his rework of the fragment overrun patches (and are based on a driver which has these patches applied). -- Cheers, Jeff