From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Subject: Re: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] e1000e: do not modify tx queue len on link speed change Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:41:00 -0800 Message-ID: <9929d2391003040641s10ceceeax1beb3bd618fb7eb5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100303143137.0BCA01220127@host64.kissl.de> <20100304.004128.236847399.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: franco@lastsummer.de, Brandeburg@host64.kissl.de, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Allan@host64.kissl.de, bruce.w.allan@intel.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:53374 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753893Ab0CDOlD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:41:03 -0500 Received: by pvb32 with SMTP id 32so370252pvb.19 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:41:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100304.004128.236847399.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 00:41, David Miller wrote: > From: franco@lastsummer.de > Date: Wed, =C2=A03 Mar 2010 15:31:37 +0100 (CET) > >> e1000e would try to set appropriate values of tx_queue_len for >> negotiated >> link speeds overwriting the already set configuration of tx_queue_le= n in >> the process. This removes all lines touching tx_queue_len from the >> driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Franco Fichtner > > Intel folks, you got this? Yes, I have added it to my queue of patches. Sorry for the delayed res= ponse. --=20 Cheers, Jeff