From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95D2F334C20; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777303535; cv=none; b=mVDR4AVuWzd7sSEv6R9DXMIH4DppWgQIbWconHQpnprMyFXIfH0pigj1zttZDRyISo1bC8QONhUBQQnIlupH4snZs8NOEZggM5eugDl8kjxYchRyxrjHamB01fheeCLQ/6jjaJu+0VFJUAHVsAYWWJ3wG58lEB/23GzpM0D1JR4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777303535; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5eGJRBHsry8VLeF9PsLXNzqWC87KtCD87UrBpwfeRG8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TPv4ykedtoiJQyeDbshsfNDHFV9QEY08C+AtMef1CivI8Ljt8UlInTLxuzpdJ05LqbLMzEm9It1dRxLYqf3QZRSwC3dcvYitl6hKletioWfS19GJk1ID50WMUkwkI6+BTMvmrec816lNz8Vx6KCclJseap5IUHAweam+bWGBeGc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=tE8BUc9F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="tE8BUc9F" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=VLUeEUxHsvQjbEylxIKcyrfUDtvJeNDxCc7Z5Zfd5yc=; b=tE8BUc9FTlXsdeIjq04yFee+zA 2G0Vv9L3FMf9i+K7vtJmHXhMn/4K6A8TJNevJm11U5Qvt0E5wSGUno14Mm5gTHXp7Ruo2MDu2Pskn lvf2IdG0jdHd2Co8ErqUga6Vllm1ichZGDNpzgAiYEskGOrsxOvZFP/SgKpO+XmmlAr4=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wHNpr-000BP9-8e; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:25:23 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:25:23 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Marco Crivellari , Netdev , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v4] wiznet: convert to GPIO descriptors Message-ID: <992f111e-febc-436d-b7ca-fa167a858e93@lunn.ch> References: <20260427142924.2702598-1-arnd@kernel.org> <20260427145010.GA2502144-robh@kernel.org> <57297b41-0f08-43eb-a73c-21a5461a4eb4@app.fastmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57297b41-0f08-43eb-a73c-21a5461a4eb4@app.fastmail.com> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 05:17:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026, at 16:50, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 04:28:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > >> The CONFIG_WIZNET_BUS_SHIFT value was apparently meant to be set > >> at compile time to a machine specific value. This was always broken > >> for multiplatform configurations with conflicting requirements, and > >> in the mainline kernel it was set to 0 anyway. Leave it defined > >> locally as 0 but rename it to something without the CONFIG_ prefix. > >> > >> Acked-by: Rob Herring > > > > Well, 3 years later and I'm a bit grumpier seeing .txt binding > > additions. A new compatible plus new property we generally require > > converting the binding first. But I'm not going to revoke my ack here. > > > > Is there even a known user for this new compatible? > > No, I'm not aware of any users neither the old nor the new > compatible, it only popped up from my backlog of patches > because of its usage of legacy GPIOs. From what I can > tell, the only users of the non-DT MMIO interface were > out of tree arch/blackfin/ boards. I would suggest giving Nicolas Saenz Julienne time to speak up. If Nicolas does not require it any more, i suggest removing it. That fits with what we are trying to do at the moment in netdev, remove old drivers. Andrew