public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path
@ 2026-03-20  7:26 David Carlier
  2026-03-24 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2026-03-24 23:00 ` Martin KaFai Lau
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Carlier @ 2026-03-20  7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, davem, Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: netdev, bpf, David Carlier

The DEVMAP_HASH branch in dev_map_redirect_multi() uses
hlist_for_each_entry_safe() to iterate hash buckets, but this function
runs under RCU protection (called from xdp_do_generic_redirect_map()
in softirq context). Concurrent writers (__dev_map_hash_update_elem,
dev_map_hash_delete_elem) modify the list using RCU primitives
(hlist_add_head_rcu, hlist_del_rcu).

hlist_for_each_entry_safe() performs plain pointer dereferences without
rcu_dereference(), missing the acquire barrier needed to pair with
writers' rcu_assign_pointer(). On weakly-ordered architectures (ARM64,
POWER), a reader can observe a partially-constructed node. It also
defeats CONFIG_PROVE_RCU lockdep validation and KCSAN data-race
detection.

Replace with hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() using rcu_read_lock_bh_held()
as the lockdep condition, consistent with the rcu_dereference_check()
used in the DEVMAP (non-hash) branch of the same functions. Also fix
the same incorrect lockdep_is_held(&dtab->index_lock) condition in
dev_map_enqueue_multi(), where the lock is not held either.

Fixes: e624d4ed4aa8 ("xdp: Extend xdp_redirect_map with broadcast support")
Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
index 3d619d01088e..cc0a43ebab6b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ int dev_map_enqueue_multi(struct xdp_frame *xdpf, struct net_device *dev_rx,
 		for (i = 0; i < dtab->n_buckets; i++) {
 			head = dev_map_index_hash(dtab, i);
 			hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(dst, head, index_hlist,
-						 lockdep_is_held(&dtab->index_lock)) {
+						rcu_read_lock_bh_held()) {
 				if (!is_valid_dst(dst, xdpf))
 					continue;
 
@@ -747,7 +747,6 @@ int dev_map_redirect_multi(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dst, *last_dst = NULL;
 	int excluded_devices[1+MAX_NEST_DEV];
 	struct hlist_head *head;
-	struct hlist_node *next;
 	int num_excluded = 0;
 	unsigned int i;
 	int err;
@@ -787,7 +786,7 @@ int dev_map_redirect_multi(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	} else { /* BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH */
 		for (i = 0; i < dtab->n_buckets; i++) {
 			head = dev_map_index_hash(dtab, i);
-			hlist_for_each_entry_safe(dst, next, head, index_hlist) {
+			hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(dst, head, index_hlist, rcu_read_lock_bh_held()) {
 				if (is_ifindex_excluded(excluded_devices, num_excluded,
 							dst->dev->ifindex))
 					continue;
-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path
  2026-03-20  7:26 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path David Carlier
@ 2026-03-24 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2026-03-24 23:00 ` Martin KaFai Lau
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-03-24 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Carlier; +Cc: ast, daniel, davem, kuba, netdev, bpf

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:26:45 +0000 you wrote:
> The DEVMAP_HASH branch in dev_map_redirect_multi() uses
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe() to iterate hash buckets, but this function
> runs under RCU protection (called from xdp_do_generic_redirect_map()
> in softirq context). Concurrent writers (__dev_map_hash_update_elem,
> dev_map_hash_delete_elem) modify the list using RCU primitives
> (hlist_add_head_rcu, hlist_del_rcu).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8ed82f807bb0

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path
  2026-03-20  7:26 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path David Carlier
  2026-03-24 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
@ 2026-03-24 23:00 ` Martin KaFai Lau
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin KaFai Lau @ 2026-03-24 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Carlier
  Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, davem, Jakub Kicinski,
	netdev, bpf



On 3/20/26 12:26 AM, David Carlier wrote:
> The DEVMAP_HASH branch in dev_map_redirect_multi() uses
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe() to iterate hash buckets, but this function
> runs under RCU protection (called from xdp_do_generic_redirect_map()
> in softirq context). Concurrent writers (__dev_map_hash_update_elem,
> dev_map_hash_delete_elem) modify the list using RCU primitives
> (hlist_add_head_rcu, hlist_del_rcu).
> 
> hlist_for_each_entry_safe() performs plain pointer dereferences without
> rcu_dereference(), missing the acquire barrier needed to pair with
> writers' rcu_assign_pointer(). On weakly-ordered architectures (ARM64,
> POWER), a reader can observe a partially-constructed node. It also
> defeats CONFIG_PROVE_RCU lockdep validation and KCSAN data-race
> detection.
> 
> Replace with hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() using rcu_read_lock_bh_held()
> as the lockdep condition, consistent with the rcu_dereference_check()
> used in the DEVMAP (non-hash) branch of the same functions. Also fix
> the same incorrect lockdep_is_held(&dtab->index_lock) condition in
> dev_map_enqueue_multi(), where the lock is not held either.

Applied. Thanks.

Take a look at the review here:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260320072645.16731-1-devnexen%40gmail.com

The first comment is legit and please followup. The second comment looks 
unrelated.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-24 23:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-20  7:26 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use RCU-safe iteration in dev_map_redirect_multi() SKB path David Carlier
2026-03-24 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-03-24 23:00 ` Martin KaFai Lau

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox