From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
To: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Cc: aswin@linux.ibm.com, gbayer@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, julianr@linux.ibm.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, horms@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] s390/ism: Zerorize dmb at allocation
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 17:58:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <99fd2571-7fc5-4e4f-993a-b858f83581fd@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179081520578.2192623.15327890080313694045.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
On 01.10.26 02:40, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote:
> Hello:
>
> This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
> by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
>
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:14:20 +0200 you wrote:
>> Sashiko reported [1] that 'Missing __GFP_ZERO in folio_alloc() causes
>> uninitialized kernel memory to be exposed in the receive message buffer'.
>> An ism dmb is receive-only, so the data is not leaked to a remote peer. In
>> general the smc kernel module (dibs client) will only push newly received
>> data to userspace. We still should not have uninitialized data in a receive
>> buffer.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Here is the summary with links:
> - [net,v2] s390/ism: Zerorize dmb at allocation
> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/a0227fa24e8a
>
> You are awesome, thank you!
On 29.09.26 09:59, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>
> As mentioned in the commit message this issue was reported by Sashiko and found
> valid by me. I do not see a simple reproducer.
Hello Jakub and Greg,
I did some more thinking and now I have a reproducer, where a modified remote
smc peer causes a local kernel memory leak.
Reproducer and logs can be sent upon request.
Kindly consider this for net and stable and CVE.
There is nothing wrong with the statements in the commit message,
but I should have thought more about the worst case and written
a reproducer, I guess.
Sorry about that.
Alexandra
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 15:14 [PATCH net v2] s390/ism: Zerorize dmb at allocation Alexandra Winter
2026-09-28 15:19 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-09-29 7:59 ` Alexandra Winter
2026-10-01 0:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-10-09 15:58 ` Alexandra Winter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=99fd2571-7fc5-4e4f-993a-b858f83581fd@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=aswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox