From: Dany Madden <drt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Brian King <brking@linux.ibm.com>,
Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] ibmvnic: drop bad optimization in reuse_tx_pools()
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 10:13:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b4f0980933eaa345b5dc25a4c9f41ae@imap.linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211201054836.3488211-2-sukadev@linux.ibm.com>
On 2021-11-30 21:48, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> When trying to decide whether or not reuse existing rx/tx pools
> we tried to allow a range of values for the pool parameters rather
> than exact matches. This was intended to reuse the resources for
> instance when switching between two VIO servers with different
> default parameters.
>
> But this optimization is incomplete and breaks when we try to
> change the number of queues for instance. The optimization needs
> to be updated, so drop it for now and simplify the code.
>
> Fixes: bbd809305bc7 ("ibmvnic: Reuse tx pools when possible")
> Reported-by: Dany Madden <drt@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dany Madden <drt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 14 +++-----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index 6df92a872f0f..0bb3911dd014 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -866,17 +866,9 @@ static bool reuse_tx_pools(struct ibmvnic_adapter
> *adapter)
> old_mtu = adapter->prev_mtu;
> new_mtu = adapter->req_mtu;
>
> - /* Require MTU to be exactly same to reuse pools for now */
> - if (old_mtu != new_mtu)
> - return false;
> -
> - if (old_num_pools == new_num_pools && old_pool_size == new_pool_size)
> - return true;
> -
> - if (old_num_pools < adapter->min_tx_queues ||
> - old_num_pools > adapter->max_tx_queues ||
> - old_pool_size < adapter->min_tx_entries_per_subcrq ||
> - old_pool_size > adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq)
> + if (old_mtu != new_mtu ||
> + old_num_pools != new_num_pools ||
> + old_pool_size != new_pool_size)
> return false;
>
> return true;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-01 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-01 5:48 [PATCH net 1/2] ibmvnic: drop bad optimization in reuse_rx_pools() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-12-01 5:48 ` [PATCH net 2/2] ibmvnic: drop bad optimization in reuse_tx_pools() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2021-12-01 18:13 ` Dany Madden [this message]
2021-12-01 18:18 ` Rick Lindsley
2021-12-01 18:12 ` [PATCH net 1/2] ibmvnic: drop bad optimization in reuse_rx_pools() Dany Madden
2021-12-01 18:18 ` Rick Lindsley
2021-12-02 12:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b4f0980933eaa345b5dc25a4c9f41ae@imap.linux.ibm.com \
--to=drt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).