From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] rhashtable: use bit_spin_locks to protect hash
 bucket.
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 05:53:46 -0400
Message-ID: <9bea77df-e7db-677a-31b2-710dc6d956ee@gmail.com>
References: <152782754287.30340.4395718227884933670.stgit@noble>
 <152782824984.30340.1634082820568216846.stgit@noble>
 <20180602050322.liesw324q5kawcue@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:36361 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750940AbeFBJxu (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 2 Jun 2018 05:53:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180602050322.liesw324q5kawcue@gondor.apana.org.au>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>



On 06/02/2018 01:03 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
 
> Yes the concept looks good to me.  But I would like to hear from
> Eric/Dave as to whether this would be acceptable for existing
> network hash tables such as the ones in inet.


What about lockdep support ?