From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] veth: implement support for set_channel ethtool op
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 16:38:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c451d25fb36bc82e602bb93e384b262be743fbf.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c3d691c01121e4110f23d5947b2809d5cce056b.camel@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2021-07-09 at 12:49 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-07-09 at 12:15 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > > + if (netif_running(dev))
> > > + veth_close(dev);
> > > +
> > > + priv->num_tx_queues = ch->tx_count;
> > > + priv->num_rx_queues = ch->rx_count;
> >
> > Why can't just you use netif_set_real_num_*_queues() here directly (and
> > get rid of the priv members as above)?
>
> Uhm... I haven't thought about it. Let me try ;)
Here there is a possible problem: if the latter
netif_set_real_num_*_queues() fails, we should not change the current
configuration, so we should revert the
first netif_set_real_num_*_queues() change.
Even that additional revert operation could fail. If/when that happen
set_channel() will leave the device in a different state from both the
old one and the new one, possibly with an XDP-incompatible number of
queues.
Keeping the netif_set_real_num_*_queues() calls in veth_open() avoid
the above issue: if the queue creation is problematic, the device will
stay down.
I think the additional fields are worthy, WDYT?
Cheers,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 9:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] veth: more flexible channels number configuration Paolo Abeni
2021-07-09 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] veth: implement support for set_channel ethtool op Paolo Abeni
2021-07-09 10:15 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-07-09 10:49 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-07-09 11:36 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-07-09 14:38 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2021-07-09 15:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-07-09 16:35 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-07-09 19:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-07-09 19:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-07-12 1:44 ` David Ahern
2021-07-12 10:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-07-12 15:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-07-09 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] veth: make queues nr configurable via kernel module params Paolo Abeni
2021-07-09 10:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-07-09 15:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-07-09 16:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-07-09 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] selftests: net: veth: add tests for set_channel Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c451d25fb36bc82e602bb93e384b262be743fbf.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).