netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com>,
	ncardwell@google.com, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: correct the skip logic in tcp_sacktag_skip()
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 10:24:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c67190f-62c2-4498-937d-5213de1a3fe0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250713152253.110107-1-guoxin0309@gmail.com>

On 7/13/25 5:22 PM, Xin Guo wrote:
> tcp_sacktag_skip() directly return the input skb only
> if TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq>skip_to_seq,
> this is not right, and  the logic should be
> TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq>=skip_to_seq, 

Adding Kuniyuki

I'm not sure this statement is actually true. A more clear (and slightly
more descriptive) commit message could help better understanding the
issue. What is the bad behaviour you are observing?

Ideally a packetdrill test case to demonstrate it would help

> for example
> if start_seq is equal to tcp_highest_sack_seq() ,
> the start_seq is equal to seq of skb which is from
> tcp_highest_sack().
> and on the other side ,when
> tcp_highest_sack_seq() < start_seq in
> tcp_sacktag_write_queue(),
> the skb is from tcp_highest_sack() will be ignored
> in tcp_sacktag_skip(), so clean the logic also.
> 
> Fixes: 75c119afe14f ("tcp: implement rb-tree based retransmit queue")

At very least the fixes tag looks wrong, because AFAICS such change did
not modify the behaviour tcp_sacktag_skip.

> Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com>

Thanks,

Paolo


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-17  8:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-13 15:22 [PATCH net-next] tcp: correct the skip logic in tcp_sacktag_skip() Xin Guo
2025-07-17  8:24 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-07-17 13:36   ` Xin Guo
2025-07-17 14:14     ` Neal Cardwell
2025-07-17 14:30       ` Xin Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c67190f-62c2-4498-937d-5213de1a3fe0@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guoxin0309@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).