From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB1F34D398 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 22:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774478161; cv=none; b=Yu9AIMX2FY7GxksPyl7r/tyiuzkmKsM6kMsY7wju4oaZiCakwBFo8DZAYf14b8EqIaTnDcE2Res3qM3SnvghpUowQXulqUP3VZU7DTcIuC3Nk6/KvvsOyjZz9KFhX1wciSsZa53qkv4cPZEIN8VXC+j3EQ6cJPh9aQnIuHSVrHQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774478161; c=relaxed/simple; bh=44iRR8m/XegOSdPWUGbXk2jl5bSd2QmBPmIBixtWoRY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=A02b4g83db3y/Oq2OYwvzhxMZZ9aWKGDsAqI32g7ZwCDEttmHKWMNgWxVvpQ9TB4Px+0V/XSqAyPvJn1xBrJJ5RCmYbs31t0GIZM1xYxpOFJQ3RBR8FLnCzuuOwdCQXsnfpIzaL4fPK8jtukcbKXHUhrnOLK44wPfXK8eHfjZvA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JxOd7hZT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JxOd7hZT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68087C4CEF7; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 22:36:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774478160; bh=44iRR8m/XegOSdPWUGbXk2jl5bSd2QmBPmIBixtWoRY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=JxOd7hZTE1RHI4+H6TyvDtbw0w1TL01Kida+8qArfF7tfIUX10e0qo9G8gzxb0BGz QzyKzPTSx4ZdiOYDKVyhmaIz4EWjKN6hsUXio7CD6JajZLOlkphR/SC4wCLTmu6QVN WsPjCqqe8ypKZiyAZtFDVBmE+25OyGcpEOdIO6dvJt6dB9lRu+U5VhC+a/Za+HVZZg PFmCbCcHM2yzWOhkcz2vO7vXh0xZS1XfjCRoma2gH8jIB+pZzwYdFoUocbqGFbQdLw iW1ZtuCFiA9OA6Od/pboJXTK/fav/nUrDOQPx6XufAj0mTBQJKy0dctcg0hJ2WzAHX Q+vVckHO4xyGQ== Message-ID: <9c93ed45-2af8-466c-9b3d-ad87ba144fc0@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:35:59 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vrf: Remove unnecessary synchronize_rcu() invocations Content-Language: en-US To: Ido Schimmel , Eric Dumazet Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, petrm@nvidia.com, lirongqing@baidu.com References: <20260324155521.525292-1-idosch@nvidia.com> <20260324155521.525292-4-idosch@nvidia.com> <1ea4c187-9c1f-4e15-b472-07a82abd3260@kernel.org> <20260325144228.GA686135@shredder> <20260325201155.GA909880@shredder> From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: <20260325201155.GA909880@shredder> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/25/26 2:11 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > Did some more digging. I don't see a reason for keeping the dst pointers > RCU protected. I can replace patch #3 with the following one in v2: > > https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/3fbc1cad610df95cfcde117394c2c3d9e9a04e65.patch LGTM. Thanks for digging into the sequence.