From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
To: Md Danish Anwar <a0501179@ti.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
nm@ti.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, srk@ti.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add ICSSG ethernet driver
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:58:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc8df06-8ad3-234d-b221-b1af2ee3719a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6713252d-6f86-c674-9229-c4512ebf1d72@ti.com>
On 09/02/2023 12:29, Md Danish Anwar wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 08/02/23 18:26, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>>>>> +static int prueth_config_rgmiidelay(struct prueth *prueth,
>>>>>>> + struct device_node *eth_np,
>>>>>>> + phy_interface_t phy_if)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + if (phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID ||
>>>>>>> + phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID)
>>>>>>> + rgmii_tx_id |= ICSSG_CTRL_RGMII_ID_MODE;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + regmap_update_bits(ctrl_mmr, icssgctrl_reg, ICSSG_CTRL_RGMII_ID_MODE, rgmii_tx_id);
>>>>
>>>> This is only applicable to some devices so you need to restrict this only
>>>> to those devices.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Currently ICSSG driver is getting upstreamed for AM65 SR2.0 device, so I don't
>>> think there is any need for any device related restriction. Once support for
>>> other devices are enabled for upstream, we can modify this accordingly.
>>
>> The problem is, this is a board property, not a SoC property. What if
>> somebody designs a board with extra long clock lines in order to add
>> the delay?
>>
>>> I checked the latest Technical Reference Manual [1] (Section 5.1.3.4.49, Table
>>> 5-624) for AM65 Silicon Revision 2.0.
>>>
>>> Below is the description in Table 5-624
>>>
>>> BIT : 24
>>> Field : RGMII0_ID_MODE
>>> Type : R/W
>>> Reset : 0h
>>> Description : Controls the PRU_ICSSG0 RGMII0 port internal transmit delay
>>> 0h - Internal transmit delay is enabled
>>> 1h - Reserved
>>>
>>> The TX internal delay is always enabled and couldn't be disabled as 1h is
>>> reserved. So hardware support for disabling TX internal delay is not there.
>>
>> So if somebody passes a phy-mode which requires it disabled, you need
>> to return -EINVAL, to indicate the hardware cannot actually do it.
>>
>
> Sure, I'll do that. In the list of all phy modes described in [1], I can only
> see phy-mode "rgmii-txid", for which we can return -EINVAL. Is there any other
> phy-mode that requires enabling/disabling TX internal delays? Please let me
> know if any other phy-mode also needs this. I will add check for that as well.
>
>>> As, TX internal delay is always there, there is no need to enable it in MAC or
>>> PHY. So no need of API prueth_config_rgmiidelay().
>>>
>>> My approach to handle delay would be as below.
>>>
>>> *) Keep phy-mode = "rgmii-id" in DT as asked by Andrew.
>>
>> As i said this depends on the board, not the SoC. In theory, you could
>> design a board with an extra long RX clock line, and then use phy-mode
>> rgmii-txid, meaning the MAC/PHY combination needs to add the TX delay.
>>
>
> Yes I understand that board can have any phy-mode in it's DTS. We need to be
> able to handle all different phy modes.
>
>>> *) Let TX internal delay enabled in Hardware.
>>> *) Let PHY configure RX internal delay.
>>> *) Remove prueth_config_rgmiidelay() API is there is no use of this. TX
>>> Internal delay is always enabled.
>>> *) Instead of calling prueth_config_rgmiidelay() API in prueth_netdev_init()
>>> API, add below if condition.
>>>
>>> if(emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID)
>>> emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID
>>
>> You should handle all cases where a TX delay is requested, not just
>> ID.
>>
>
> So there could be four different RGMII phy modes as described in [1]. Below is
> the handling mechanism for different phy modes.
>
> 1) # RGMII with internal RX and TX delays provided by the PHY,
> # the MAC should not add the RX or TX delays in this case
> - rgmii-id
>
> For phy-mode="rgmii-id", phy needs to add both TX and RX internal delays. But
> in our SoC TX internal delay is always enabled. So to handle this, we'll change
OK. I thought that this MAC forced TX delay issue was fixed in Later Silicon Revisions.
But it looks like it hasn't been fixed yet.
> the phy-mode in driver to "rgmii-rxid" and then pass it ti PHY, so that PHY
> will enable RX internal delay only.
OK.
>
> 2) # RGMII with internal RX delay provided by the PHY, the MAC
> # should not add an RX delay in this case
> - rgmii-rxid
>
> For phy-mode="rgmii-rxid", phy needs to add only RX internal delay. We will do
> nothing in the driver and just pass the same mode to phy, so that PHY will
> enable RX internal delay only.
But the MAC is forcing TX-delay right? So this case can't be implemented.
you have to return error.
>
> 3) # RGMII with internal TX delay provided by the PHY, the MAC
> # should not add an TX delay in this case
> - rgmii-txid
>
> For phy-mode="rgmii-txid", phy needs to add only TX internal delay,the MAC
> should not add an TX delay in this case. But in our SoC TX internal delay is
> always enabled. So this scenario can not be handled. We will return -EINVAL in
> this case.
As you didn't return error for 1st case "rgmii-id" even though TX delay was requested
for PHY but you added it in the MAC I see no reason to return error here.
You just do the delay in MAC and pass "rgmii" to the PHY.
>
>
> 4) # RX and TX delays are added by the MAC when required
> - rgmii
>
> For phy-mode="rgmii", MAC needs to add both TX and RX delays. But in our SoC TX
> internal delay is always enabled so no need to add TX delay. For RX I am not
> sure what should we do as there is no provision of adding RX delay in MAC
> currently. Should we ask PHY to add RX delay?
>
I don't think it will work so you can error out in this case.
> Andrew, Roger, Can you please comment on this.
>
> Apart from Case 4, below code change will be able to handle all other cases.
>
> if(emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID)
> emac->phy_if = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID;
> if(emac->phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> Please let me know if I am missing any other phy modes.
>
> [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-controller.yaml
>
>> Andrew
>
cheers,
-roger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-09 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-06 6:07 [PATCH v4 0/2] Introduce ICSSG based ethernet Driver MD Danish Anwar
2023-02-06 6:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add ICSSG Ethernet Driver bindings MD Danish Anwar
2023-02-06 7:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-06 10:39 ` [EXTERNAL] " Md Danish Anwar
2023-02-06 10:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-07 5:07 ` Md Danish Anwar
2023-02-06 13:46 ` Rob Herring
2023-02-07 5:00 ` [EXTERNAL] " Md Danish Anwar
2023-02-06 6:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add ICSSG ethernet driver MD Danish Anwar
2023-02-06 14:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-07 15:29 ` [EXTERNAL] " Md Danish Anwar
2023-02-07 19:56 ` Roger Quadros
2023-02-08 7:46 ` [EXTERNAL] " Md Danish Anwar
2023-02-08 9:17 ` Roger Quadros
2023-02-08 12:56 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-09 10:29 ` [EXTERNAL] " Md Danish Anwar
2023-02-09 12:58 ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2023-02-09 13:43 ` [EXTERNAL] " Md Danish Anwar
2023-02-09 13:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-02-10 6:26 ` [EXTERNAL] " Md Danish Anwar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9cc8df06-8ad3-234d-b221-b1af2ee3719a@kernel.org \
--to=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=a0501179@ti.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=srk@ti.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).