From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B412F8BF0 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 09:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777541666; cv=none; b=LbxklY8FYW7KoqdWbsHU5EDVoeNTiM0J6rNaHNaeDI2D28Tr+exXMIhuXkG2T5oTb4BtwgwQAEWwrS3FEu1kaER+PWtY+1dqOgLdN0Rwe9VDtv+dymOHPEBPZyd/CIMqBJ6SG5AcgVeT6ROAP7R0aBVUos95g7zUAOwQ/gxSFLs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777541666; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6TManpl4gcqzmqAn+8fUAGVRHhuyH7T7ouTpR8dqiSM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=icVkcBDoERPe53AmHY3BFoS3jnt6a3ULcrHlpvOqH7jA/u9LEIZ+CsNPpZC+PQBMrsecSYcMZTlJ6SELgrAyLDjMP1ACSl1cZVSl7Iyo840XFjrdN5edHv2wjY485HJbA3cS0bvVEHoDY28aWYHftjyNCOTSg4XSHTL0tFp7oJE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=EyC2ie09; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=OiXgsBrY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EyC2ie09"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="OiXgsBrY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1777541663; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RVHyDFwjO6klzKvDUezrJjMUwHWUlJqJfALG2/aYsdI=; b=EyC2ie09pSYehijGa4aUDyVQlsGTq7t92C2exawAd3xXA4yIBJqkm7rrmnRSam8Ra2Lwg5 ixT1dpaRZXxnxr/Y19CYC9dn53XWbWa6gvdq6jBwH+DLfVKP1WNAA1OaXihrZ6CMXGUex2 ulRICzpLzwIeZ282keJE2jAJYumGHzs= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-323-qwP4jzFNMauItvCF22XYfg-1; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 05:34:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: qwP4jzFNMauItvCF22XYfg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: qwP4jzFNMauItvCF22XYfg_1777541661 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43d1dea12aaso618371f8f.1 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 02:34:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1777541661; x=1778146461; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RVHyDFwjO6klzKvDUezrJjMUwHWUlJqJfALG2/aYsdI=; b=OiXgsBrY+SZzSz1ZH+nyxFo5mHQ96KWjIOiiNG/RxX83uiZbip9eRrJti1ZIPYy4eO 5Wgt4sFhZAelDNKRXfYeN88aVfBDwT35NSnRqqMnWE2g/Q+2L0ZHM6IYQDsfE+jU+rw/ V+UsuiIWYO2aMAR52/XPfuXOrO4ASROqG0yeJ0rseO4NEak8N33EuzGHSqV617vcXXCj ATfi3NohVHrFdl1ka36Wk64UUtDcfnSg+05qhUztgFZuufTFrkYmFD+cg88wql2QAncK OQPVlzk86vYWvqPRfrzYzEmMOWyRtQL7rJ5edu5mLJenYOXHxvC+qt7X1Vh4FZeGUYpG Btuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1777541661; x=1778146461; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=RVHyDFwjO6klzKvDUezrJjMUwHWUlJqJfALG2/aYsdI=; b=rrqAJkWlFFRzQbZ95CTzj74VIlcn2nVTroHPw7ALvSOH+L2sRnWrzUXpAbV0hUNu2b L9dS2zSzSQYz0oWCwjTXdd1JK29b64PaoKbfRGymsf/UBsGUN9+CKDuohR6e22PZZt+H nv8g8NNJRffn0BDmMjXEvTugUDyE7htUNpZTWgS6U26X65nJj5lVMT/89ti3qKDxqLJH S8etBB0q9UsysN9153Ta+Ck2zZmqbOsCdsk8f8HoTd90/H7FPFBiMyOSpxJWXOB7dD32 RfsPV2Nyqn0/Jd2COprt2NQb9GLmtX2DLnqR0g14Ui+A8RbkuT+gmglngGEOxbzHyDGa 3MHg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9LrgOeoVwtRY0FxNJrX+DIR6bnxqQo9a2qRH3tYdgJ7RP9VX023jbVTWuPbn2LyU2KDyHTh44=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyVsAzNG29SbReyDBBjbs8zkqBX04MEfSsdzhWMiyuWOHBVpCb6 Ii5S8maz2FiVDhkZn5yANsRS9UHjH86a6qaks1YBeRn5BoHacqt9TUM8qKlfsN81qJww8rUTYBo I7BzZQUQHpkomRulcxDOUcmmUVjR/1v5zYfn+TR2ICHKI2eqUkxwwp+r4HQ== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDievPVFEQfrDpBEvbZJ6pGH2BSNXp+g9WU3Nio/sLrN7JbJan7k1XeMPoF456EAo GxShm17TBuUgsBGNxIlPYgw3PYjSrgWF9rVPDht9VcQFImBi08hIAs0x53ON8jXkoQLluacMxj3 Or5K1j56+B47wgX7i3JDYaVK9w60LeYEpAf59CsFbiqIVwqQALh2nytDh2H2Azg5mgDhcgenjao iSGacqrwgvgdIBuhuum3lSI0/BcuC7S7aVwEVHzOHYUdnP0kza7yFJddeaQZbHToRE1jUkFkhap deF/HO2w4uTCyC+FYQ60228YKF+A8bu8yy6WYZZumtSlsag/al5kHZIemR0KZW/OzOyGAaTOuFn WkppFpF3nPkyg/C760F/vLEkgbvG3ILzwiqMbdYrLiujWQ6aUObwe7qexFkLcJJYsJw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:40dd:b0:447:55b5:d532 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4493ec62a60mr3634735f8f.37.1777541660745; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 02:34:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:40dd:b0:447:55b5:d532 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4493ec62a60mr3634660f8f.37.1777541660114; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 02:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.88.32] ([150.228.93.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-447b76e5c0csm11853942f8f.29.2026.04.30.02.34.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Apr 2026 02:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9d7f1bbc-155d-4c18-bcf7-732ebe4cbf67@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 11:34:17 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net: pppoe: implement GRO/GSO support To: Qingfang Deng , Michal Ostrowski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , David Ahern , Simon Horman , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau References: <20260326081127.61229-1-dqfext@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Paolo Abeni In-Reply-To: <20260326081127.61229-1-dqfext@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/26/26 9:11 AM, Qingfang Deng wrote: > +static int pppoe_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff) > +{ > + struct pppoe_hdr *phdr = (struct pppoe_hdr *)(skb->data + nhoff); > + __be16 type = pppoe_hdr_proto(phdr); > + struct packet_offload *ptype; > + unsigned int len; > + > + ptype = gro_find_complete_by_type(type); > + if (!ptype) > + return -ENOENT; > + > + len = skb->len - (nhoff + sizeof(*phdr)); > + len = min(len, 0xFFFFU); AFAICS, when the computed len is >= 64K, and the above min() will truncate it, later pppoe_rcv() will drop the packet. I think you should prevent such case at GRO time, flushing the chain when it grows too big. > + phdr->length = cpu_to_be16(len); > + > + return INDIRECT_CALL_INET(ptype->callbacks.gro_complete, > + ipv6_gro_complete, inet_gro_complete, > + skb, nhoff + PPPOE_SES_HLEN); > +} > + > +static struct sk_buff *pppoe_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb, > + netdev_features_t features) > +{ > + unsigned int pppoe_hlen = sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) + 2; > + struct sk_buff *segs = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + u16 mac_offset = skb->mac_header; > + struct packet_offload *ptype; > + u16 mac_len = skb->mac_len; > + struct pppoe_hdr *phdr; > + __be16 orig_type, type; > + int len, nhoff; > + > + skb_reset_network_header(skb); > + nhoff = skb_network_header(skb) - skb_mac_header(skb); > + > + if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, pppoe_hlen))) > + goto out; > + > + phdr = (struct pppoe_hdr *)skb_network_header(skb); > + type = pppoe_hdr_proto(phdr); > + ptype = gro_find_complete_by_type(type); > + if (!ptype) > + goto out; > + > + orig_type = skb->protocol; > + __skb_pull(skb, pppoe_hlen); > + segs = ptype->callbacks.gso_segment(skb, features); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(segs)) { > + skb_gso_error_unwind(skb, orig_type, pppoe_hlen, mac_offset, > + mac_len); > + goto out; > + } > + > + skb = segs; > + do { > + phdr = (struct pppoe_hdr *)(skb_mac_header(skb) + nhoff); > + len = skb->len - (nhoff + sizeof(*phdr)); > + phdr->length = cpu_to_be16(len); > + skb->network_header = (u8 *)phdr - skb->head; I understand is quite late for the following question, but... The network headers points to the pppoe hdr. Should it point to the actual IP hdr? Why not? A comment in the code or in the commit message would be appreciated. /P