netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sonny <smaniaol@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kernel 2.4 vs 2.6 Traffic Controller performance
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:14:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dbec86d0710022314o6db2b0baua6db543d52f312b6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello
This is a repost, there seems to have a misunderstanding before.

I hope this is the right place to ask this. Does any know if there is a
substantial difference in the performance of the traffic controller
between kernel 2.4 and 2.6. We tested it using 1 iperf server and use
250 and 500 clients, altering the burst.

This is the set-up:
iperf client -  router (w/ traffic controller) - iperf server

We use the top command inside the router to check the idle time of our
router to see this. The results we got from the 2.4 kernel shows
around 65-70% idle time while the 2.6 shows
60-65% idle time. We tried to use MRTG and we're not getting any
results either. We want to know if we could improve the bandwidth by
upgrading the kernel, else we would have to get a new bandwidth
manager.  Have anyone performed a similar test or can suggest a better
way to do this. Thanks in advance.

             reply	other threads:[~2007-10-03  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-03  6:14 Sonny [this message]
2007-10-03  7:00 ` kernel 2.4 vs 2.6 Traffic Controller performance Eric Dumazet
2007-10-03  8:31   ` Sonny
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-03  0:30 Kernel 2.4 vs 2.6 Traffic Controller Performance Sonny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9dbec86d0710022314o6db2b0baua6db543d52f312b6@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=smaniaol@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).