From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
juri.lelli@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/core: Enable socket busy polling on -RT
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 13:16:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e128547a586f1ee122879c616941340455c2f51.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523111518.21512-1-kurt@linutronix.de>
Hi,
Tue, 2023-05-23 at 13:15 +0200, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> Busy polling is currently not allowed on PREEMPT_RT, because it disables
> preemption while invoking the NAPI callback. It is not possible to acquire
> sleeping locks with disabled preemption. For details see commit
> 20ab39d13e2e ("net/core: disable NET_RX_BUSY_POLL on PREEMPT_RT").
>
> However, strict cyclic and/or low latency network applications may prefer busy
> polling e.g., using AF_XDP instead of interrupt driven communication.
>
> The preempt_disable() is used in order to prevent the poll_owner and NAPI owner
> to be preempted while owning the resource to ensure progress. Netpoll performs
> busy polling in order to acquire the lock. NAPI is locked by setting the
> NAPIF_STATE_SCHED flag. There is no busy polling if the flag is set and the
> "owner" is preempted. Worst case is that the task owning NAPI gets preempted and
> NAPI processing stalls. This is can be prevented by properly prioritising the
> tasks within the system.
>
> Allow RX_BUSY_POLL on PREEMPT_RT if NETPOLL is disabled. Don't disable
> preemption on PREEMPT_RT within the busy poll loop.
>
> Tested on x86 hardware with v6.1-RT and v6.3-RT on Intel i225 (igc) with
> AF_XDP/ZC sockets configured to run in busy polling mode.
>
> Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
The patch looks reasonable to me, but it would be great to hear a
second opinion from someone from RT side.
CC: Juri
Thanks!
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-23 11:15 [PATCH net-next] net/core: Enable socket busy polling on -RT Kurt Kanzenbach
2023-05-25 11:16 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2023-05-25 13:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2023-05-26 8:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-10-27 11:43 ` Florian Bezdeka
2023-10-28 10:09 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2023-10-30 11:29 ` Florian Bezdeka
2023-11-08 7:41 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9e128547a586f1ee122879c616941340455c2f51.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).