From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Gross Subject: Re: 2.6.37 regression: adding main interface to a bridge breaks vlan interface RX Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:04:21 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4D4FE100.5090808@gmail.com> <20110301101609.GA13261@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: chriss , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Francois Romieu Return-path: Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:56123 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752727Ab1CAUEW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:04:22 -0500 Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so4506138vws.19 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 12:04:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110301101609.GA13261@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Francois Romieu = wrote: > Jesse Gross : > [...] >> Putting a vlan device on eth1 actually affects the behavior of the >> driver, which is why that works. =A0I suspect that if you put the vl= an >> device on both the physical interface and the bridge you would see >> packets with tags on the bridge. >> >> Regardless, the solution is to remove the dependency on vlan devices >> by converting over to the new vlan model. =A0Francois, any chance th= at >> you might have some time to look at this? > > The completely untested patch below is available for the (really) des= perate > souls. > > I should do a -next testing session this afternoon for this patch + > Oliver's Neukum advertisement control + Hayes 8105e stuff (in reverse= order). Thanks Francois. When you are ready this looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Jesse Gross