From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, STOX_REPLY_TYPE,STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495BAC5B578 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 23:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20D620836 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2019 23:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=plus.com header.i=@plus.com header.b="ZwGnTmFn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726757AbfGFXHB (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jul 2019 19:07:01 -0400 Received: from avasout07.plus.net ([84.93.230.235]:35742 "EHLO avasout07.plus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726469AbfGFXHA (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jul 2019 19:07:00 -0400 Received: from Ultrabook1 ([81.174.172.105]) by smtp with ESMTPA id jtlihfwhZljKgjtljh4aJN; Sun, 07 Jul 2019 00:06:59 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=plus.com; s=042019; t=1562454420; bh=X6tnLuhP2GtNDny84NocORC/8sxCsog5VCE0V+7wGJw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=ZwGnTmFnA/IOKagO+4bD3TUYsWknEyVoBdyWfKY6BxKTLlCQrjV3qXxHVcvxBU4r9 3hRLNKKzgcsdYcGrlqYcfwrhCdz6o+MdL6AG9XgI+0E+GEroMz6Jo1DkqrOIun7Gdx V1SLVA5VtMYFUQcLokPSvlVzlT6vJXhPyC47LIxVryu+s4oSHooanKjDEnQMKPmdNV ZLTasMcOXeMYyh6fAHjdiPkfNA/y2dsd6HR0KSNTWkRuUo71F0CFIs6ie8XkZCsTKe +Nd2GZy/XtWngM0eTJetOy4LOwgJiYBtecqG0R1XDmvyRQn8Y6o0nKg/iAtdugmBmS 6Bsh61qTl+S7g== X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ermhMbhX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Cgy7cPM/+uUNK5d9KfAcsw==:117 a=Cgy7cPM/+uUNK5d9KfAcsw==:17 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=NdwDdLHFcajMHM5En7EA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=Ew2E2A-JSTLzCXPT_086:22 X-AUTH: moeller@:2500 Message-ID: From: "Markus Moeller" To: Subject: More complex PBR rules Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 00:06:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEhdhhyTwpvmHxf6GtB5Hn4L7sxk4fmUnOpbmJcOsH1WSa+iKWQEvpW1Go4xAcrro16PdRfjjAt8S/raLoJ8ejZOLheOFAVL+6YZhIsBHfuPh51IybOz c9IsGEw7KUEtrkIG8RYJrrxjRGR/0PL4ffVxsmjOXVyPURPH2oem4KjbftkFz68UOD83Esg1LJX6SA== Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Network developers I am new to this group and wonder if you can advise how I could implement more complex PBR rules to achieve for example load balancing. The requirement I have is to route based on e.g. a hash like: hash(src-ip+dst-ip) mod N routes via gwX 0