From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.39-rc5-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.38 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:50:04 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler , Andrew Morton , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alex Elder , xfs-VZNHf3L845pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote= : > > Bug-Entry =A0 =A0 =A0 : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D= 34012 > Subject =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : 2.6.39-rc4+: oom-killer busy killing tasks > Submitter =A0 =A0 =A0 : Christian Kujau > Date =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 2011-04-22 1:57 (9 days old) > Message-ID =A0 =A0 =A0: > References =A0 =A0 =A0: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D130343= 744622331&w=3D2 Judging by the extended debug info in: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.39-rc4/oom/ (The -9 files are the current ones) that thing shows a _lot_ of xfs inodes: xfs_inode 479187 479187 1120 14 4 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 34329 34329 0 even though there aren't that many dentries (each inode should have at least one dentry associated with it under normal circumstances): dentry 97896 97900 160 25 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 3916 3916 0 and then later when the system gets low on memory, the dentries shrink: dentry 1017 3525 160 25 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 141 141 0 but the XFS inodes do not: xfs_inode 557579 557579 1120 14 4 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 41492 41492 0 so I suspect it's some kind of XFS inode leak. Linus