From: "Michał Mirosław" <mirqus@gmail.com>
To: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] net-core: extending (hw_/wanted_/vlan_)features fields to a bitmap.
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:29:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik3Uz_zu5qev1bc=mop4fUTYGZaDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302050665-10460-2-git-send-email-maheshb@google.com>
2011/4/6 Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>:
> Converting current use of (hw_/wanted_/vlan_)features to
> legacy_(hw_/wanted_/vlan_)features to differntiate from the proposed usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> net/core/dev.c | 51 +++++++++++----------
> net/core/ethtool.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> net/core/net-sysfs.c | 4 +-
> net/core/sock.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 09d2624..637bf2a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -980,6 +980,42 @@ struct net_device_ops {
> u32 features);
> };
>
> +enum netdev_features {
> + NETIF_F_SG_BIT, /* Scatter/gather IO. */
> + NETIF_F_IP_CSUM_BIT, /* Can checksum TCP/UDP over IPv4. */
> + NETIF_F_NO_CSUM_BIT, /* Does not require checksum. F.e. loopack. */
> + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM_BIT, /* Can checksum all the packets. */
> + NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM_BIT, /* Can checksum TCP/UDP over IPV6 */
> + NETIF_F_HIGHDMA_BIT, /* Can DMA to high memory. */
> + NETIF_F_FRAGLIST_BIT, /* Scatter/gather IO. */
> + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX_BIT, /* Transmit VLAN hw acceleration */
> + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX_BIT, /* Receive VLAN hw acceleration */
> + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER_BIT, /* Receive filtering on VLAN */
> + NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED_BIT, /* Device cannot handle VLAN packets */
> + NETIF_F_GSO_BIT, /* Enable software GSO. */
> + NETIF_F_LLTX_BIT, /* LockLess TX - deprecated. Please */
> + /* do not use LLTX in new drivers */
> + NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL_BIT, /* Does not change network namespaces */
> + NETIF_F_GRO_BIT, /* Generic receive offload */
> + NETIF_F_LRO_BIT, /* large receive offload */
> + /* the GSO_MASK reserves bits 16 through 23 */
> + RESERVED1_BIT,
> + RESERVED2_BIT,
> + RESERVED3_BIT,
> + RESERVED4_BIT,
> + RESERVED5_BIT,
> + RESERVED6_BIT,
> + RESERVED7_BIT,
> + RESERVED8_BIT,
> + NETIF_F_FCOE_CRC_BIT, /* FCoE CRC32 */
> + NETIF_F_SCTP_CSUM_BIT, /* SCTP checksum offload */
> + NETIF_F_FCOE_MTU_BIT, /* Supports max FCoE MTU, 2158 bytes*/
> + NETIF_F_NTUPLE_BIT, /* N-tuple filters supported */
> + NETIF_F_RXHASH_BIT, /* Receive hashing offload */
> + NETIF_F_RXCSUM_BIT, /* Receive checksumming offload */
> + NETIF_F_NOCACHE_COPY_BIT, /* Use no-cache copyfromuser */
> +};
> +
This should be a separate cleanup patch. And after that, for the
conversion you would add as a last entry:
NETIF_F_NUM_BITS and use it later (see below).
> /*
> * The DEVICE structure.
> * Actually, this whole structure is a big mistake. It mixes I/O
> @@ -1029,44 +1065,51 @@ struct net_device {
> struct list_head napi_list;
> struct list_head unreg_list;
>
> +#define DEV_FEATURE_WORDS 2
> +#define DEV_FEATURE_BITS (DEV_FEATURE_WORDS*sizeof(long)*BITS_PER_BYTE)
> +#define LEGACY_FEATURE_WORD 0
> +
#define DEV_FEATURE_WORDS BITS_TO_LONGS(NETIF_F_NUM_BITS)
#define DEV_FEATURE_BITS (DEV_FEATURE_WORDS*BITS_PER_LONG)
Though using bitmaps will make a mess for 32 versus 64 bit archs. It
would be better to stick to u32 as the base type instead of long.
[...]
> @@ -2376,13 +2419,13 @@ static inline void netif_tx_unlock_bh(struct net_device *dev)
> }
>
> #define HARD_TX_LOCK(dev, txq, cpu) { \
> - if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_LLTX) == 0) { \
> + if ((dev->legacy_features & NETIF_F_LLTX) == 0) { \
[...]
For those type of conversion there is really no point in using the
macro. Changing it to
dev->features[0] instead of dev->legacy_features needs the same effort
but avoids the
cleanup later. Flags in other feature words could have names line
NETIF_F2_xxx so that
it would be clear in which word they belong.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-06 0:44 [PATCH 00/20] extending (hw_/wanted_/vlan_)features fields to a bitmap Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 01/20] net-core: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 02/20] net-ipv4: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 03/20] net-ipv6: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 04/20] net-vlan: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 05/20] net-bridge: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 06/20] net-decnet: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 07/20] net-dsa: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 08/20] net-l2tp: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 09/20] net-phonet: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 10/20] net-sctp: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 11/20] net-wireless: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 12/20] loopback: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 13/20] veth: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 14/20] jme: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 15/20] sungem: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 16/20] sunhme: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 17/20] usb-smsc75xx: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 18/20] usb-smsc95xx: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 19/20] virtio_net: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 0:44 ` [PATCH 20/20] xen: " Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 1:27 ` [PATCH 01/20] net-core: " Ben Hutchings
2011-04-06 1:35 ` Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-06 1:45 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-04-06 10:29 ` Michał Mirosław [this message]
2011-04-06 17:34 ` Mahesh Bandewar
2011-04-07 15:00 ` [PATCHv2 " Mahesh Bandewar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTik3Uz_zu5qev1bc=mop4fUTYGZaDQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mirqus@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=maheshb@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).