From: "Michał Mirosław" <mirqus@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: use batched device unregister
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 08:56:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim2e1Gm_jqfY89is-FfRYTu2=G02w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304916275.3207.79.camel@edumazet-laptop>
2011/5/9 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>:
> veth devices dont use the batched device unregisters yet.
>
> Since veth are a pair of devices, it makes sense to use a batch of two
> unregisters, this roughly divide dismantle time by two.
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -451,8 +451,16 @@ static void veth_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
> priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> peer = priv->peer;
>
> - unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
> - unregister_netdevice_queue(peer, head);
> + if (head == NULL) {
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
> + /* make a batch of two devices to speedup unregister */
> + unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, &list);
> + unregister_netdevice_queue(peer, &list);
> + unregister_netdevice_many(&list);
> + } else {
> + unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
> + unregister_netdevice_queue(peer, head);
> + }
You could change dellink callers to always pass head != NULL. As a
side effect, unregister_netdevice_queue() would do just what its name
suggests.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-09 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-07 11:08 Scalability of interface creation and deletion Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 12:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 15:26 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 16:23 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-07 16:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 16:44 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-07 16:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08 3:45 ` Ben Greear
2011-05-08 8:08 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-09 21:46 ` Octavian Purdila
2011-05-07 16:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:24 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08 10:09 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:50 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 7:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08 8:06 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 9:35 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:18 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 13:13 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 13:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 14:27 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 14:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 15:17 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 15:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 21:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 4:44 ` [PATCH] veth: use batched device unregister Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 6:56 ` Michał Mirosław [this message]
2011-05-09 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 9:17 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: use batched device unregister in veth and macvlan Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 18:42 ` David Miller
2011-05-09 19:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 20:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 6:40 ` [PATCH net-2.6] vlan: fix GVRP at dismantle time Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 19:23 ` David Miller
2011-05-09 7:45 ` [PATCH v2 net-next-2.6] veth: use batched device unregister Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 9:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 5:37 ` Scalability of interface creation and deletion Alex Bligh
2011-05-09 6:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 7:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-09 17:30 ` Jesse Gross
2011-05-08 12:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 13:06 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 13:14 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-07 18:51 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 19:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:38 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:44 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTim2e1Gm_jqfY89is-FfRYTu2=G02w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=mirqus@gmail.com \
--cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).