From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Miros=B3aw?= Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/6 net-next] netdevice.h: Add zero-copy flag in netdevice Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 23:48:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1305574128.3456.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1305574518.2885.25.camel@bwh-desktop> <1305574680.3456.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1305575253.2885.28.camel@bwh-desktop> <20110516211459.GE18148@redhat.com> <1305588738.3456.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Ben Hutchings , David Miller , Eric Dumazet , Avi Kivity , Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Shirley Ma Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1305588738.3456.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org 2011/5/17 Shirley Ma : > Hello Michael, > > Looks like to use a new flag requires more time/work. I am thinking > whether we can just use HIGHDMA flag to enable zero-copy in macvtap t= o > avoid the new flag for now since mavctap uses real NICs as lower devi= ce? Is there any other restriction besides requiring driver to not recycle the skb? Are there any drivers that recycle TX skbs? Best Regards, Micha=B3 Miros=B3aw