From: tsuna <tsunanet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: alexander.zimmermann@comsys.rwth-aachen.de, hagen@jauu.net,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Implement a two-level initial RTO as per draft RFC 2988bis-02.
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 13:30:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinzTN=w9213+pCvBWuT5af7L7bKfg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519.152703.1327182804872376183.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:27 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> So using SCTP as an example of "see we do this already over here" is a
> non-starter. Don't do it.
Fair enough. I hope that the "there's no one-size-fits-all solution"
argument has more weight than "hey SCTP does it". :)
--
Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
Software Engineer @ www.StumbleUpon.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 7:40 [PATCH] tcp: Expose the initial RTO via a new sysctl Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-17 7:40 ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-17 8:01 ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-17 8:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 8:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-17 11:02 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-17 12:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-18 10:43 ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-18 19:26 ` David Miller
2011-05-18 19:40 ` tsuna
2011-05-18 19:52 ` David Miller
2011-05-18 20:20 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-18 20:23 ` David Miller
2011-05-18 20:27 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-20 10:27 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2011-05-20 11:00 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-20 12:37 ` Alan Cox
2011-05-21 0:06 ` H.K. Jerry Chu
2011-05-31 14:48 ` tsuna
2011-05-31 15:25 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-31 15:28 ` tsuna
2011-05-31 15:43 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-19 2:22 ` [PATCH] tcp: Implement a two-level initial RTO as per draft RFC 2988bis-02 Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19 2:36 ` David Miller
2011-05-19 3:56 ` tsuna
2011-05-19 4:14 ` David Miller
2011-05-19 4:33 ` tsuna
2011-05-19 5:46 ` David Miller
2011-05-19 6:36 ` [PATCH] tcp: Lower the initial RTO to 1s " Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19 17:42 ` Yuchung Cheng
2011-05-19 6:47 ` Benoit Sigoure
2011-05-19 20:16 ` David Miller
2011-05-19 6:10 ` [PATCH] tcp: Implement a two-level initial RTO " Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19 6:25 ` tsuna
2011-05-19 6:36 ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19 6:42 ` tsuna
2011-05-19 6:52 ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19 7:07 ` tsuna
2011-05-19 8:02 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-05-19 16:40 ` tsuna
2011-05-19 16:55 ` Alexander Zimmermann
2011-05-19 17:11 ` tsuna
2011-05-19 19:27 ` David Miller
2011-05-19 20:30 ` tsuna [this message]
2011-05-20 2:01 ` [PATCH] tcp: Expose the initial RTO via a new sysctl H.K. Jerry Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTinzTN=w9213+pCvBWuT5af7L7bKfg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tsunanet@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.zimmermann@comsys.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hagen@jauu.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).