From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [net-next v5 8/8] i40e: include i40e in kernel proper Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:28:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1378447278-13998-1-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <1378447278-13998-9-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,<20130905231436.761d03c3@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "gospo@redhat.com" , "sassmann@redhat.com" To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:23266 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738Ab3IFG2D convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 02:28:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130905231436.761d03c3@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:15 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" > wrote: Dumb question why is this named Kbuild instead of Makefile like almost every other network driver? All the new kids are doing it, we'll at least that is what I thought when I made it. Re-reading https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt I see that Makefile is preferred but Kbuild overrides Makefile. Either way works, but I would prefer not to rename it at this point but would gladly do so in a follow up patch