From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 5/6] enic: feature add: add ethtool -c/C support
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:15:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C757AC34.1B4BB%scofeldm@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261591999.2782.41.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com>
On 12/23/09 10:13 AM, "Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:21 -0800, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
>>
>> Only rx_usec and tx_usec options for ethtool -C are settable as those
>> are the only settings that make sense to HW. Adds driver reporting of
>> intr coalescing timer value in usec units rather than HW units.
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c b/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
>> index 019b148..81cc68d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c
>> @@ -261,7 +261,63 @@ static void enic_set_msglevel(struct net_device *netdev,
>> u32 value)
>> enic->msg_enable = value;
>> }
>>
>> -static const struct ethtool_ops enic_ethtool_ops = {
> [...]
>> +static struct ethtool_ops enic_ethtool_ops = {
> [...]
>
> I don't see any reason to remove the const here. Is that an accidental
> change?
That was a mistake. Sigh. Let me resend patch set without that change...
[I'll wait a while in case there are any more review comments]
-scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-23 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 2:21 [net-next PATCH 0/6] enic: updates to version 1.1.0.241a Scott Feldman
2009-12-22 2:21 ` [net-next PATCH 1/6] enic: Bug fix: use safe queue shutdown in dev->stop Scott Feldman
2009-12-22 2:21 ` [net-next PATCH 2/6] enic: Bug fix: try harder to fill Rx ring on skb allocation failures Scott Feldman
2009-12-22 2:21 ` [net-next PATCH 3/6] enic: minimize pkt filter updates to firmware Scott Feldman
2009-12-22 2:21 ` [net-next PATCH 4/6] enic: Bug fix: align desc ring sizes to 32 descs Scott Feldman
2009-12-22 2:21 ` [net-next PATCH 5/6] enic: feature add: add ethtool -c/C support Scott Feldman
2009-12-22 5:47 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-23 18:13 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-12-23 19:15 ` Scott Feldman [this message]
2009-12-22 2:21 ` [net-next PATCH 6/6] enic: whitespace cleanup; #define cleanup; more verbose err msg Scott Feldman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-23 23:27 [net-next PATCH 0/6] enic: updates to version 1.1.0.241a Scott Feldman
2009-12-23 23:27 ` [net-next PATCH 5/6] enic: feature add: add ethtool -c/C support Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 2:09 [net-next PATCH 0/6] enic: updates to version 1.1.0.241 Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 2:10 ` [net-next PATCH 5/6] enic: feature add: add ethtool -c/C support Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 10:10 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-19 19:33 ` Scott Feldman
2009-12-20 1:15 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C757AC34.1B4BB%scofeldm@cisco.com \
--to=scofeldm@cisco.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).