From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <chrisw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add netdev port-profile support (take III, was iovnl)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:54:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7FDD272.2C86D%scofeldm@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004281513.58879.arnd@arndb.de>
On 4/28/10 6:13 AM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> What I could imagine to unify this is something like
>
> ip port_profile set DEVICE [ { pre_associate | pre_associate_rr } ]
> { name PORT-PROFILE | vsi MGR:VTID:VER }
> mac LLADDR
> [ vlan VID ]
> [ host_uuid HOST_UUID ]
> [ client_uuid CLIENT_UUID ]
> [ client_name CLIENT_NAME ]
> ip port_profile del DEVICE [ mac LLADDR [ vlan VID ] ]
> ip port_profile show DEVICE
Arnd, can someone test this with VDP today? I don't have access to that
equipment so it's difficult for me to fully test the unified patch. I can
test the previous patch with enic easily because I have access to production
systems. I'd like to make sure someone can test this with VDP before I
respin the patch one more time.
-scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-28 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-28 4:42 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add netdev port-profile support (take III, was iovnl) Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 4:42 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/2] add ndo_set_port_profile op support for enic dynamic vnics Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 18:39 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 19:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 22:38 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-29 12:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-29 14:32 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-29 15:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-29 16:31 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-30 20:34 ` Scott Feldman
2010-05-01 12:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-03 4:29 ` Vivek Kashyap
2010-05-03 11:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-03 16:18 ` Vivek Kashyap
2010-04-28 13:13 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add netdev port-profile support (take III, was iovnl) Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 17:51 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 19:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 18:54 ` Scott Feldman [this message]
2010-04-28 19:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C7FDD272.2C86D%scofeldm@cisco.com \
--to=scofeldm@cisco.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).