From: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>,
Dirk Herrendoerfer <d.herrendoerfer@de.ibm.com>,
Vivek Kashyap <vivk@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] IFLA_PORT_* iproute2 cmd line
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 07:49:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C8228316.35508%scofeldm@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005261438.07004.arnd@arndb.de>
On 5/26/10 5:38 AM, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Scott Feldman wrote:
>> I need to provide an iproute2 patch for IFLA_PORT_* and I wanted to hash out
>> the cmd line before I submit it. Here's what I think would work based on
>> previous input from Arnd:
>>
>> Usage: ip port associate DEVICE [ vf NUM ] {PROFILE|VSI}
>> ip port pre-associate DEVICE [ vf NUM ] VSI
>> ip port pre-associate-rr DEVICE [ vf NUM ] VSI
>> ip port dis-associate DEVICE [ vf NUM ]
>> ip port show [ DEVICE [ vf NUM ] ]
>>
>> PROFILE := port-profile PORT-PROFILE
>> [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
>> [ host-uuid HOST-UUID ]
>>
>> VSI := vsi managerid MGR typeid VTID typeidversion VER
>> [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
>>
>> Comments?
>
> The syntax of the PROFILE and VSI arguments seems ok, but I'm
> not sure where exactly to put them.
>
> When talking to the kernel, I think this should be part of
> link command, because that is the underlying protocol:
>
> ip link set DEVICE [vf NUM] {associate {PROFILE|VSI} |
> pre-associate-rr VSI |
> pre-associate VSI |
> disassociate }
> ip link show [ DEVICE [ vf NUM ] ]
>
> This will also let you combine the association with additional
> "vf mac" and "vf vlan" commands as needed.
How does this strike you?
Usage: ip link add link DEV [ name ] NAME
[ txqueuelen PACKETS ]
[ address LLADDR ]
[ broadcast LLADDR ]
[ mtu MTU ]
type TYPE [ ARGS ]
ip link delete DEV type TYPE [ ARGS ]
ip link set DEVICE [ { up | down } ]
[ arp { on | off } ]
[ dynamic { on | off } ]
[ multicast { on | off } ]
[ allmulticast { on | off } ]
[ promisc { on | off } ]
[ trailers { on | off } ]
[ txqueuelen PACKETS ]
[ name NEWNAME ]
[ address LLADDR ]
[ broadcast LLADDR ]
[ mtu MTU ]
[ netns PID ]
[ alias NAME ]
+ [ virtualport MODE {PROFILE|VSI} ]
[ vf NUM [ mac LLADDR ]
[ vlan VLANID [ qos VLAN-QOS ] ]
- [ rate TXRATE ] ]
+ [ rate TXRATE ]
+ [ virtualport MODE {PROFILE|VSI} ] ]
ip link show [ DEVICE ]
TYPE := { vlan | veth | vcan | dummy | ifb | macvlan | can }
+
+ MODE := { associate | preassociate | preassociaterr | disassociate }
+
+ PROFILE := port-profile PORT-PROFILE
+ [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
+ [ host-uuid HOST-UUID ]
+
+ VSI := vsi managerid MGR typeid VTID typeidversion VER
+ [ instance-uuid INSTANCE-UUID ]
> The more interesting question is how to do this when we
> talk to lldpad. One idea was to use the same protocol
> but to direct the message to a specific pid (that of lldpad).
> That would require adding an option like '-p PID' to ip
> that lets us change who we talk to.
Let me get the user-to-kernel part working to establish the cmd line and you
can follow up with alternative addressing schemes.
> Alternatively, we could also create a top-level command like
> the one you described, but just use it for the case when
> we're talking to lldpad, finding out the PID from the
> /var/run/lldpdad.pid internally. Right now, I'm leaning
> towards the more flexible option of being able to direct
> the command anywhere.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-26 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 3:19 [RFC] IFLA_PORT_* iproute2 cmd line Scott Feldman
2010-05-26 12:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-26 14:49 ` Scott Feldman [this message]
2010-05-27 7:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <OFCF88A167.122DD206-ON8525772F.00470999-8525772F.0047F4A5@us.ibm.com>
2010-05-26 15:56 ` Chris Wright
[not found] ` <OFB3363EDA.945755DA-ON8525772F.0057CBD1-8525772F.00589D2B@us.ibm.com>
2010-05-26 16:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C8228316.35508%scofeldm@cisco.com \
--to=scofeldm@cisco.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=d.herrendoerfer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=stefanb@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vivk@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).