From: "Vincent, Pradeep" <pradeepv@amazon.com>
To: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: UDP Fragmentation and DF bit..
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:45:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C8231CDB.16FC5%pradeepv@amazon.com> (raw)
After running into issues with UDP in multi-MTU network environment, I
started digging through the code and found somewhat inconsistent behavior
(if I read the code right)
OMan 7 ip¹ declares that ³The system-wide default is controlled by the
ip_no_pmtu_disc sysctl for SOCK_STREAM sockets, and disabled on all
others.² which led me to think ODF¹ bit will not be set for UDP packets.
But..
The code in ip_output.c seems to do the following,
1. If packet size <= current PMTU, then set the DF=1 and send the packet
out.
2. If packet size > current PMTU, then set DF=0 and send the packet out
after fragmentation.
In a network environment where MTU-big and MTU-small co-exist (and have
router¹s fragmentation turned off in favor of PMTU discovery), UDP packets
that are > MTU-small and < MTU-big find the PMTU effectively but UDP packets
that are > MTU-big get dropped. This looks like inconsistent behavior to me
and doesn¹t seem to match the advertised behavior.
Is there a reason why PMTU support for UDP is somewhat inconsistent ?
Is there a reason ODF¹ bit cannot be set on fragmented packets on UDP
transmission ? I couldn¹t find anything in RFC for IP protocol that
prohibited DF bit on fragmented packets. Did I miss
something here ?
Would it be reasonable if PMTU discovery is performed (DF bit set +
appropriate icmp logic) even for locally fragmented packets ? I think this
will be a great help for UDP users that don¹t have PMTU handling logic in
the application (most udp applications belong to this category in my
experience). Thoughts ?
Thanks,
- Pradeep Vincent
next reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-27 1:45 Vincent, Pradeep [this message]
2010-05-27 9:43 ` UDP Fragmentation and DF bit Andi Kleen
2010-05-27 21:58 ` Vincent, Pradeep
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C8231CDB.16FC5%pradeepv@amazon.com \
--to=pradeepv@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).