From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:35:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSc7Gt0v8_KGEibC_8LKAe-yvL10KuJeoiAdYFDiED-5cQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626113959.GC27420@f1>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 7:40 AM Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On 2019/06/26 09:36, Manish Chopra wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 1:19 PM
> > > To: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>; GR-Linux-NIC-Dev <GR-Linux-
> > > NIC-Dev@marvell.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [EXT] [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size
> > >
> > > External Email
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Tx rings have sbq_buf_size = 0 but there's no case where the code actually
> > > tests on that value. We can remove sbq_buf_size and use a constant instead.
> > >
> >
> > Seems relevant to RX ring, not the TX ring ?
>
> qlge uses "struct rx_ring" for rx and for tx completion rings.
>
> The driver's author is probably laughing now at the success of his plan
> to confuse those who would follow in his footsteps.
:-)
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-17 7:48 [PATCH net-next 01/16] qlge: Remove irq_cnt Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 02/16] qlge: Remove page_chunk.last_flag Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:12 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 03/16] qlge: Deduplicate lbq_buf_size Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:24 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 11:37 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 15:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-28 8:57 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-28 14:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 04/16] qlge: Remove bq_desc.maplen Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:31 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 05/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.sbq_buf_size Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 9:36 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 11:39 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 15:35 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 06/16] qlge: Remove useless dma synchronization calls Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 9:44 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-06-18 2:51 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 07/16] qlge: Deduplicate rx buffer queue management Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-27 10:02 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-07-09 2:10 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 08/16] qlge: Fix dma_sync_single calls Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 09/16] qlge: Remove rx_ring.type Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 10/16] qlge: Factor out duplicated expression Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-23 17:59 ` David Miller
2019-06-23 18:00 ` David Miller
2019-06-24 7:52 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-25 18:32 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-28 8:52 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 11/16] qlge: Remove qlge_bq.len & size Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-27 10:47 ` Manish Chopra
2019-07-09 6:52 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 12/16] qlge: Remove useless memset Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 13/16] qlge: Replace memset with assignment Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 14/16] qlge: Update buffer queue prod index despite oom Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 15/16] qlge: Refill rx buffers up to multiple of 16 Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 7:48 ` [PATCH net-next 16/16] qlge: Refill empty buffer queues from wq Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-27 14:18 ` [EXT] " Manish Chopra
2019-07-10 1:18 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-17 16:49 ` [PATCH net-next 01/16] qlge: Remove irq_cnt Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 8:59 ` Manish Chopra
2019-06-26 11:36 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-06-26 13:21 ` Manish Chopra
2019-07-05 8:33 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-07-15 1:40 ` Benjamin Poirier
2019-07-15 9:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+FuTSc7Gt0v8_KGEibC_8LKAe-yvL10KuJeoiAdYFDiED-5cQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com \
--cc=bpoirier@suse.com \
--cc=manishc@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).