netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Chavent <paul.chavent@onera.fr>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch, xemul@parallels.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 20:00:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSe1KCPPW=FBXZoTNmri9oPHicuoFeEMKws09PwbyRe-2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5169D9C8.8010504@redhat.com>

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/13/2013 08:56 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> When transmit timestamping is enabled at the socket level, have
>> writes to a PACKET_TX_RING record a timestamp for the generated
>> skbuffs. Tx timestamps are always looped to the application over
>> the socket error queue.
>
>
> Nitpick: if so, then this should go to net-next (subject line).

Thanks.
>
>> The patch also loops software timestamps back into the ring.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>> ---
>>   net/core/skbuff.c      |  2 +-
>>   net/packet/af_packet.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> [...]
>
>> +static void __packet_set_timestamp(struct packet_sock *po, void *frame,
>> +                                  ktime_t tstamp)
>> +{
>> +       struct tpacket_hdr *h1;
>> +       struct tpacket2_hdr *h2;
>> +       struct timespec ts;
>> +
>> +       if (!tstamp.tv64 || !sock_flag(&po->sk,
>> SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE))
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       ts = ktime_to_timespec(tstamp);
>> +
>> +       switch (po->tp_version) {
>> +       case TPACKET_V1:
>> +               h1 = frame;
>> +               h1->tp_sec = ts.tv_sec;
>> +               h1->tp_usec = ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
>> +
>> +               flush_dcache_page(pgv_to_page(&h1->tp_sec));
>> +               flush_dcache_page(pgv_to_page(&h1->tp_usec));
>
>
> Hmm, not sure, but could we also flush the dcache only once?
>
>
>> +               break;
>> +       case TPACKET_V2:
>> +               h2 = frame;
>> +               h2->tp_sec = ts.tv_sec;
>> +               h2->tp_nsec = ts.tv_nsec;
>> +
>> +               flush_dcache_page(pgv_to_page(&h2->tp_sec));
>> +               flush_dcache_page(pgv_to_page(&h2->tp_nsec));
>> +               break;
>> +       case TPACKET_V3:
>> +       default:
>> +               WARN(1, "TPACKET version not supported.\n");
>> +               BUG();
>> +       }
>> +
>> +
>
>
> Nitpick: one space too much.
>
>
>> +       smp_wmb();
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void *packet_lookup_frame(struct packet_sock *po,
>>                 struct packet_ring_buffer *rb,
>>                 unsigned int position,
>> @@ -1900,6 +1939,7 @@ static void tpacket_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff
>> *skb)
>>                 ph = skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
>>                 BUG_ON(atomic_read(&po->tx_ring.pending) == 0);
>>                 atomic_dec(&po->tx_ring.pending);
>> +               __packet_set_timestamp(po, ph, skb->tstamp);
>>                 __packet_set_status(po, ph, TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE);
>>         }
>>
>> @@ -2119,6 +2159,8 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po,
>> struct msghdr *msg)
>>                         }
>>                 }
>>
>> +               sock_tx_timestamp(&po->sk, &skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags);
>> +
>
>
> Hmm, so in case nobody wants to use timestamping on TX (which might be the
> majority
> of people), we have to go through those 3 additional if statements in
> sock_tx_timestamp()
> each time? Shouldn't we rather make the TX_RING faster? ;-)

A static key, similar to netstamp_needed, might make it cheaper, but
may be more complexity than warranted for a corner case. Simpler is
testing only the software timestamp, and in tpacket_fill_skb, where
the sk struct is already accessed. I don't feel strongly about merging
given the performance trade-off: just wanted to see if it worked.
Happy to resubmit either revision (or a better idea).

>
>>                 skb->destructor = tpacket_destruct_skb;
>>                 __packet_set_status(po, ph, TP_STATUS_SENDING);
>>                 atomic_inc(&po->tx_ring.pending);
>>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-14  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 15:29 [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap Paul Chavent
2012-12-12 19:23 ` David Miller
2012-12-13  7:13   ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 13:29 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-13 16:13   ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 18:17     ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-14  7:57       ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 10:42       ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 13:15         ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-13 18:33     ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 18:56       ` [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 22:18         ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-13 22:47           ` David Miller
2013-04-14  0:04             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  0:16               ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  0:49                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  5:16                   ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14  0:00           ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2013-04-14 10:52             ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 13:07               ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15  7:37                 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:56                   ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 16:59                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-17 10:22                     ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-19 21:51                     ` [PATCH net-next v2] packet: " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 12:33                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21  2:30                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 10:10                           ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 16:42                             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 18:14                               ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22  8:19                               ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-22 10:25                                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 14:23                                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 16:43                       ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-21  2:34                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 15:41               ` [PATCH] net-packet: " Paul Chavent
2013-04-15  9:45           ` David Laight
2013-04-15 17:08             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 17:31             ` David Miller
2013-04-15  7:31         ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:37           ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+FuTSe1KCPPW=FBXZoTNmri9oPHicuoFeEMKws09PwbyRe-2A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.chavent@onera.fr \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).