netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	Paul Chavent <paul.chavent@onera.fr>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch, xemul@parallels.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:08:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSedhCD2_uWL17bNSjDG5+3RhagkjFCVMcOx9G4H7byi2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B71D1@saturn3.aculab.com>

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:45 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
>> > +   case TPACKET_V1:
>> > +           h1 = frame;
>> > +           h1->tp_sec = ts.tv_sec;
>> > +           h1->tp_usec = ts.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
>> > +
>> > +           flush_dcache_page(pgv_to_page(&h1->tp_sec));
>> > +           flush_dcache_page(pgv_to_page(&h1->tp_usec));
>>
>> Hmm, not sure, but could we also flush the dcache only once?
>
> If it isn't a silly question, why is the dcache being flushed
> here at all?

I'm not an expert on this, but have a look at
Documentation/cachetlb.txt, specifically the bits on this function and
the discussion of aliasing: on virtually indexed cache architectures,
the same physical address may be cached in multiple cachelines at the
same time. If I understand correctly, updating the kernel logical
address does not necessarily invalidate the user virtual cacheline for
the same physical memory.

>         David
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-15 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 15:29 [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap Paul Chavent
2012-12-12 19:23 ` David Miller
2012-12-13  7:13   ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 13:29 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-13 16:13   ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 18:17     ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-14  7:57       ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 10:42       ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 13:15         ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-13 18:33     ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 18:56       ` [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 22:18         ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-13 22:47           ` David Miller
2013-04-14  0:04             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  0:16               ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  0:49                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14  5:16                   ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14  0:00           ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 10:52             ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 13:07               ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15  7:37                 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:56                   ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 16:59                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-17 10:22                     ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-19 21:51                     ` [PATCH net-next v2] packet: " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 12:33                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21  2:30                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 10:10                           ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 16:42                             ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 18:14                               ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22  8:19                               ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-22 10:25                                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 14:23                                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 16:43                       ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-21  2:34                         ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 15:41               ` [PATCH] net-packet: " Paul Chavent
2013-04-15  9:45           ` David Laight
2013-04-15 17:08             ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2013-04-15 17:31             ` David Miller
2013-04-15  7:31         ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:37           ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+FuTSedhCD2_uWL17bNSjDG5+3RhagkjFCVMcOx9G4H7byi2g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.chavent@onera.fr \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).