From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de>,
netfilter-devel <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc] netfilter: two xtables matches
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:12:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSf+fh21koZRJ_ZDsr8yiiwcw2-pJ4uTyS2pOHZGdBM1-w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121206052246.GA2905@1984>
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:00:36PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2012-12-05 20:28, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> >Somehow, the first part of this email went missing. Not critical,
>> >but for completeness:
>> >
>> >These two patches each add an xtables match.
>> >
>> >The xt_priority match is a straighforward addition in the style of
>> >xt_mark, adding the option to filter on one more sk_buff field. I
>> >have an immediate application for this. The amount of code (in
>> >kernel + userspace) to add a single check proved quite large.
>>
>> Hm so yeah, can't we just place this in xt_mark.c?
>
> I don't feel this belongs to xt_mark at all.
Do you have other concerns, or can I resubmit as is for merging in a
few days if no one raises additional issues?
For this and netfilter changes in general: should these patches be
against git://1984.lsi.us.es/nf-next instead of net-next? This patch
likely applies cleanly there, but I haven't tried yet. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-05 19:22 [PATCH rfc] netfilter: two xtables matches Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-05 19:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: add xt_priority xtables match Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-05 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: add xt_bpf " Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-05 19:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-05 20:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-07 13:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-07 16:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-08 3:31 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-08 16:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
2012-12-05 19:28 ` [PATCH rfc] netfilter: two xtables matches Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-05 20:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-05 21:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-05 21:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2012-12-05 22:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-06 5:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-06 21:12 ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2012-12-07 7:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-07 13:20 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-12-07 17:26 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+FuTSf+fh21koZRJ_ZDsr8yiiwcw2-pJ4uTyS2pOHZGdBM1-w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=willemb@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jengelh@inai.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).