netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Katz <adamkatz0@gmail.com>
To: jhs@mojatatu.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libpcap and tc filters
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:24:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA0qwj4=bOU3LDsRk591AtBWx2c_6uFwk0M4-AGrnxCPKjbbrw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309784740.26180.21.camel@mojatatu>

ok, I checked now and the packets sent by tcpreplay are identical to
the ones captured originally by wireshark.

I'm using the stock ubuntu 10.04 kernel that wasn't compiled with
CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF so sudo tc -s filter ls dev eth1 shows nothing
useful (and i'm not sure that recompiling the entire kernel is worth
it to tell me what I already know - that these packets missed the
filters... but i'm willing to do it if you think that'll help).
Anyway, I suspect the problem to be something else - I suspect that
the packets sent using tcpreplay simply skip the filters in the kernel
and are being injected somewhere afterwards. But this theory is
problematic since I find it strange that the packets do end up in the
default queue after all - hence they ARE seen by tc and they don't
skip tc entirely.

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:05 PM, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 15:37 +0300, Adam Katz wrote:
>> here's a more concrete example:
>>
>> An example configuration:
>>
>>       sudo tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: prio priomap 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
>> 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
>>       sudo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:1 handle 10: pfifo
>>       sudo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:2 handle 20: pfifo
>>       sudo tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:3 handle 30: pfifo
>>       sudo tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip
>> dport 22 0xffff flowid 1:1
>>       sudo tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip
>> sport 22 0xffff flowid 1:1
>>       sudo tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1: prio 2 u32 match ip
>> dport 80 0xffff flowid 1:2
>>       sudo tc filter add dev eth1 protocol ip parent 1: prio 2 u32 match ip
>> sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:2
>
>
> looks fine.
>
>> I then used scp to copy a small file between computers while capturing
>> with wireshark:
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3237005/port22example.pcap
>>
>> and later I replayed the same capture using tcpreplay.
>> When using scp, the packets once again ended up where they should be
>> (1:1 in this configuration). With tcpreplay they ended up in the
>> default 1:3
>
> Where is the capture from tcpreplay? What i was asking is you validate
> that the capture before and what is sent out by tcprelay look the same.
> Can you please do that?
> It is possible because your filters are not matched they end up on your
> default queue based on tos value.
>
> If you have your kernel compiled with CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF you should
> see when the filters get hit as well
> (do something like sudo tc -s filter ls dev eth1)
>
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-04 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-04  7:38 libpcap and tc filters Adam Katz
2011-07-04 10:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 11:11 ` jamal
2011-07-04 12:01   ` Adam Katz
2011-07-04 12:37     ` Adam Katz
2011-07-04 13:05       ` jamal
2011-07-04 13:24         ` Adam Katz [this message]
2011-07-04 14:06           ` jamal
2011-07-04 14:16             ` Adam Katz
2011-07-05 10:56               ` jamal
2011-07-05 12:47                 ` jamal
2011-07-05 13:07                   ` Adam Katz
2011-07-05 13:56                     ` jamal
2011-07-05 14:21                       ` Adam Katz
2011-07-05 14:41                         ` jamal
2011-07-05 15:16                           ` Adam Katz
2011-07-05 16:14                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 16:54                               ` Adam Katz
2011-07-05 19:19                                 ` jamal
2011-07-05 20:07                                   ` Adam Katz
     [not found] <CAA0qwj5Ktxi=v3XDAdTpKS_pWa+HjFL5XcN2qsK5m57JJ5G2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-03 12:49 ` Adam Katz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA0qwj4=bOU3LDsRk591AtBWx2c_6uFwk0M4-AGrnxCPKjbbrw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=adamkatz0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).