From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akshat Kakkar Subject: Re: iproute2: Behavioural Bug? Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 12:48:51 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20150824232229.GC5905@breakpoint.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Florian Westphal , netdev , Stephen Hemminger , Cong Wang To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:35117 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751935AbbHYHSw (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 03:18:52 -0400 Received: by obbwr7 with SMTP id wr7so134874509obb.2 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:18:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Well if that is the case, then just an additional information (which I have initially mentioned though), if hashtable is 800, then behaviour is correct i.e. deleting only a single filter but for hash tables other than 800, the bug (if any) gets triggered. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Akshat Kakkar wrote: >> Dear Florian, >> >> There are two filters 15:2:2 and 15:2:3 and I have deleted only >> 15:2:3, so 15:2:2 will still be there and hence this condition >> "destroy proto tp when all filters are gone" should not be applicable >> over here. >> > > Florian is correct, it _does_ look like this is caused by my patch, > I guess some check in u32_destroy() isn't correct. > > It's late here, I will look into this tomorrow. > > Thanks for the report anyway!