From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Taht Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] fq_codel: add batch ability to fq_codel_drop() Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 18:07:54 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1462146446.5535.236.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20160502094954.24cc9549@redhat.com> <1462199668.5535.239.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20160502180036.25bebdfe@redhat.com> <1462205571.5535.253.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20160502191543.170fc046@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Eric Dumazet , David Miller , netdev , Jonathan Morton To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com ([209.85.218.54]:34354 "EHLO mail-oi0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932284AbcECBHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 21:07:55 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id k142so6986246oib.1 for ; Mon, 02 May 2016 18:07:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160502191543.170fc046@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I have duplicated the issue on my own hardware. I would like to explore also upping the codel count in this scenario at some point, but: Acked-by: Dave Taht