From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Tom Herbert" <therbert@google.com>,
"Hannes Frederic Sowa" <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <dborkman@redhat.com>,
"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] dql: add a burst attribute
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:39:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5Xz132yUT83NW3JsO80byH8o00h2pswjarUazqwSErRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140930152651.GC24565@breakpoint.cc>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 15:46 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> > >
>> > > Add a new dql attribute, to control how much packets we are allowed to
>> > > burst from qdisc to device.
>> >
>> > I understand the motivation for this, but I find it a bit out-of-place
>> > to have a 'packet' type counter in bql context?
>> >
>> > Would it perhaps make more sense to restrict bulk dequeues by an upper
>> > (possibly changeable from userspace) byte counter limit?
>>
>> The byte count is already provided : its the BQL limit.
>> We already have ways to tune it (limit_min & limit_max)
>> We do not think we need something else here.
>
> So you're saying that a bulk dequeue should just grab as many skbs
> as possible until no more available or dql_avail exhausted?
>
> The "magic" value was just to be conservative and not induce any
> hol blocking, which is also why Jesper reduced it again in the latest
> submission.
>
> Then, we might later be able to remove the TSO restriction and switch
> to a pure byte-based limit.
>
> (I don't think having a packet-based count makes sense once tso/gso
> skbs can be bulk dequeued).
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
I still have some hope that we can one day fix wifi packet aggregation,
which is a limit of 42 packets or 64k bytes per aggregate (best case),
with something BQL-like.
As for the size of the tx ring problem vs GSO, there is at least one
driver with a very limited tx ring that I can think of that tears apart
GSO packets in the driver... but I'm not sure if it's mainlined.
I would not mind at all if TSO/GSO were banned on devices running
slower than 100Mbit.
Perhaps exporting the tx-ring size would be saner than a burst
parameter?
--
Dave Täht
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 8:53 [net-next PATCH V5] qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-30 11:07 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-09-30 18:20 ` David Miller
2014-10-01 13:17 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-10-01 14:55 ` Tom Herbert
2014-10-01 15:34 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-10-01 17:28 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-10-01 18:55 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-10-01 19:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-10-01 20:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-10-01 20:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-10-02 5:18 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-02 7:44 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-10-02 10:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2014-10-02 13:02 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-10-02 12:53 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2014-10-01 19:47 ` David Miller
2014-09-30 11:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 12:25 ` Florian Westphal
2014-09-30 12:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 12:41 ` Florian Westphal
2014-09-30 22:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-30 22:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 12:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 12:51 ` [net-next PATCH] dql: add a burst attribute Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 13:46 ` Florian Westphal
2014-09-30 14:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 14:26 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-30 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 15:05 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-30 14:31 ` Florian Westphal
2014-09-30 14:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 21:46 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-10-01 4:44 ` Tom Herbert
2014-09-30 15:26 ` Florian Westphal
2014-09-30 15:39 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-09-30 15:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-30 21:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw5Xz132yUT83NW3JsO80byH8o00h2pswjarUazqwSErRw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).