netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for XDP_REDIRECT in bpf_prog_run()
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 11:32:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+oqGuvm1FCnXUrfPcvNFF5iwK-FeajLO0PpnifNNZ05g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220107215438.321922-4-toke@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 1:54 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
> +
> +#define NUM_PKTS 1000000

It takes 7 seconds on my kvm with kasan and lockdep
and will take much longer in BPF CI.
So it needs to be lower otherwise CI will struggle.

> +       /* The XDP program we run with bpf_prog_run() will cycle through all
> +        * three xmit (PASS/TX/REDIRECT) return codes starting from above, and
> +        * ending up with PASS, so we should end up with two packets on the dst
> +        * iface and NUM_PKTS-2 in the TC hook. We match the packets on the UDP
> +        * payload.
> +        */

could you keep cycling through all return codes?
That should make the test stronger.

> +
> +       /* We enable forwarding in the test namespace because that will cause
> +        * the packets that go through the kernel stack (with XDP_PASS) to be
> +        * forwarded back out the same interface (because of the packet dst
> +        * combined with the interface addresses). When this happens, the
> +        * regular forwarding path will end up going through the same
> +        * veth_xdp_xmit() call as the XDP_REDIRECT code, which can cause a
> +        * deadlock if it happens on the same CPU. There's a local_bh_disable()
> +        * in the test_run code to prevent this, but an earlier version of the
> +        * code didn't have this, so we keep the test behaviour to make sure the
> +        * bug doesn't resurface.
> +        */
> +       SYS("sysctl -qw net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1");

Does it mean that without forwarding=1 the kernel will dead lock ?!

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-08 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-07 21:54 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add support for transmitting packets using XDP in bpf_prog_run() Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-07 21:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] bpf: Add "live packet" mode for " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-08  2:44   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-08 13:19     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-08 19:28       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-08 20:19         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-09  2:24           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-09 12:30             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-13  1:37               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-02-11  7:19                 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-02-11 16:03                   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-07 21:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/3] selftests/bpf: Move open_netns() and close_netns() into network_helpers.c Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-07 21:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for XDP_REDIRECT in bpf_prog_run() Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-01-08 19:32   ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2022-01-08 20:29     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAADnVQ+oqGuvm1FCnXUrfPcvNFF5iwK-FeajLO0PpnifNNZ05g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).